Why hasn’t the UN demanded the unconditional surrender of Hezballah?
Amid the calls for Israel to ‘stop the violence’ something seems to have been lost. Moral clarity. The international community seems unable to find the moral clarity to oppose Hezballah, a terrorist organization, with anything more than a few token words. It’s so much easier to demand that Israel ‘stop the violence’. The pathetic incompetence of the UN takes some time to digest but it staggers the imagination how very incompetent and pathetic it actually is.
Protestors ransack and destroy UN headquarters in Beirut and the, "personal representative of U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan in Lebanon," condemns Israel! Is this not amazing? I suppose that if the IDF had instead bombed the UN headquarters in Beirut in retaliation for Hezballah rockets hitting a residential home in Israel that he would have condemned Hezballah? No? Well, why not?
2006-07-31
09:48:34
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Military