this morning and killed some more civilians. Are they cowardly, or just plain retarded?
2006-07-30 22:15:50 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
they are a$$holes and they need to get the F out of there.
2006-07-30 22:18:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Israel agreed to stop air attacks for 48 hrs or until they completed an investigaestion in the bombing of the residence in Qatan. They reserved the right to eliminate imminent threats. There was no formal cease fire agreement, just a temporary halt. Hezbollah has the power to stop this whole thing. But, as long as they persist in THEIR attacks, Israel will not back down one little bit.
2006-07-30 22:26:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Friend, you see the damages that is happening in your town. Did you ever think why Israel is hammering you again and again like the one happening there? The solution is there inside your place. Catch hold of it and treat properly. Otherwise your innocent people will be in trouble for ever. If you are wise, make a peace treaty and end the subject right now. If you think you are smart and strong, bear the pain.
You all called Israel to the battle field and now you say are cowards!!!
My only question is what those dead civilians were doing,
Whether they were having breakfast or playing football or swimming in the resort??
You know it as you watched the scene properly and I can assume.
2006-07-30 23:28:36 · answer #3 · answered by SESHADRI K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This whole thing is like a hostage situation with Hezbollah using it's own people as hostages, then daring Israel to do anything about it. No one will ever convince me that Hezbollah wasn't responsible for civilian deaths in that bombing incident Sunday. Israel gave advanced warning as they have been throughout these operations. Hezbollah either planted those children there or refused to let them leave. They WANTED them to die. To them it only strengthens their position in the world view. Think about it. These people blow themselves up for their "cause", why not a few Lebanese children. People had better wise up to what Israel is dealing with, because eventually we will all be dealing with the same thing. (actually we have been for years but some don't realize it)
2006-07-31 00:15:18 · answer #4 · answered by RunningOnMT 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They suspended air strikes for 48 hrs , not a cease fire.
Meanwhile hez-booger fired over 100 rockets into Isreal from civilian areas .
hez-booger fights from behind the civilians , knowing civilians will get hurt,so who's the retarded coward ?
2006-07-30 23:08:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
For the cease fire, they reserved the right to strike locations which would imminently attack them.
They are neither "retarded" or cowardly, likely you are reading more propoganda news articles about yesterdays news.
2006-07-30 22:20:31 · answer #6 · answered by Wig 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its not a ceasefire moron...its a 48hr suspension on Israeli air strikes. They reserve the right to launch attacks at any time at suspected threats.
Meanwhile Hezbollah did not declare a moratorium on their attacks...they just kept launching and launching rockets...You saying then that Israel must restrain itself while Hezbollah attacks with abandon...it seems you are the real retard here.
2006-07-31 01:03:12 · answer #7 · answered by betterdeadthansorry 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
GOOD!!! At least the Israelis are doing what the Americans seem incapable of doing... killing muzzies. There will be no peace in the Middle East until every muzzy man, woman, and child is wiped off the face of the earth...
2006-07-30 22:21:39 · answer #8 · answered by Sean T 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
THERE WAS NO CEASE FIRE AGREED UPON.
ISRAEL CALLED OF ITS AIR STRIKES FOR 48 HOURS. AFTER THE TRAGIC MIS - BOMBING.
IF ANYTHING THE HEZBOLLAH TERRORISTS HAVE BROKEN, JUST ABOUT EVERTHING, THAT'S BEEN PUT, IN FRONT OF THEM.
INCLUDING FIRING MORE ROCKETS INTO ISRAEL, DURING THE ISRAELI HALTING OF BOMBINGS.
IF LEBANESE GOVERNMENT, HAD TAKEN ACTION, AGAINST THE HEZBOLLAH TERRORISTS, AT THE START, NONE OF THIS WOULD HAVE HAPPENED.
2006-07-31 01:19:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is retarded is your thinking that there was a cease-fire agreement.
2006-07-31 02:20:11 · answer #10 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
properly ethicly and in accordance to the Geneva convention, No. you're no longer "meant" to aim any civilians, civilian homes if obtainable, or hospitals. besides the undeniable fact that, if it bring about an entire scale conflict, and Iran gained.. Then they could be high quality. with the aid of fact the winner tries the loser for conflict Crimes, no longer vice versa
2016-11-03 08:53:21 · answer #11 · answered by porterii 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋