If the religionists had any sense they would scrap the ancient bibles and write a new one; and then maybe they wouldn't have to keep defending the indefensible, explaining a lot of contradictions, and in general, stop themselves looking like complete idiots.
2006-07-30 20:27:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you missed a word in your question. But there won't be a third testament. If you actually read the Bible you will find out why. Read the book of John for starters.
2006-07-31 03:20:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by blizgamer333 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Testament is testimony. but in the new Testament, Jesus said, this is my father's will. So there is no need for a third testament. Because, God has set his mind to do all he has said in the other two.
2006-07-31 03:20:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by aguyinthewoods 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If they do come up with a new one, I wonder how many corporate ad sharks will be jockeying for the best product placement.
2006-07-31 03:21:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Muffie 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No need for a third testament.
The end is here Jesus is coming back very soon.
And then where will you be?
2006-07-31 03:20:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Messiah crazy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why? You think not enough crime committed in the other two. You want third, to start third world war.
2006-07-31 03:18:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
God says he's already done all he's going to do. Now it's just up to us to do what he told us to do, tell people about jesus and wait for him to come back.
2006-07-31 03:22:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Chris K 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, both Muhammad and Joseph Smith claim to have done that, so why not? It worked for them.
2006-07-31 03:18:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by XYZ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its 2,000 years from the last one, I think it will take a decade or a little more years.of millenniums.
2006-07-31 03:23:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Walt. 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, and I think you are the one to write it.
2006-07-31 03:16:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋