Why does everyone have a theory on what causes cancer, without any kind of believable reason?

Question

Everyone has some bullsh*t idea about something that causes cancer!! Where are people getting their info from, Today Tonight? Examples, just from this site today are hair dye, fake tan, and deodorant. Have a think about it, ppl! If these common items caused cancer, girls, the fresh-smelling, and the tanned would have no hope. Does anyone else think that this is one of the more hypochondriac and annoying trends??

Well, then, if every bloody thing causes cancer what hope do we have anyway?! I'd rather chow down my char-grilled steak and have a life rather than worrying about every stupid little thing that someone at some time thinks might cause cancer. It's like on that Jennifer Anniston movie where she has a ferret and eats bar peanuts - despite the fact that they're filthy - they taste good. Go wrap yourselves in cotton wool if thats what you think will save you from 'de evil cancer'.

Answer 1

People always seem to have to have either someone or something to blame for everything because I think it makes them feel better having a concrete explanation as to why something is. My 5 yr old son has cancer and I asked the doctors the same questions - was it something I exposed him to? or something in the environment.?? . .and they all say the same thing that sometimes it just happens and cells go bad and there isnt a concrete answer all the time. In my opinion - the "people" that say all these things cause cancer are just covering thier butts and saying it now in the hopes that in the future should they actually be found to cause it they can say "well we warned you" but in realtiy as you said if it truly did then the FDA would have pulled it of the shelves a long time ago. I mean at this point you can get cancer from sitting in the sun to long - so really its a bunch of garbage. Live your life - cause you could die falling out of bed tomorrow. . . . . .

Answer 2

Jennifer Anniston movie where she has a ferret and eats bar peanuts - despite the fact that they're filthy - they taste good. Go wrap yourselves in cotton wool if thats what you think will save you from 'de evil cancer'.

first if a ferret is fealthy it is because the owner is fealthy ok from their you sound so much like me i say that if they no that causes cancer then don't you think they would know how to cure it dah

if coffee is causing cancer then wouldn't you know how to cure it since you know how it caused dah

so i feel your frustration on that part do i ever.

Answer 3

Theory often results in real answers;until then they are just theories. Excess in any area is the basis for many health problems. You would have to eat a lot of char grilled burgers to get cancer I think. One theory that has been proved is that some cancers are hereditary. Over exposure to sun has been proved to cause skin cancer. Moderation and sun screens are the key. A tan can be achieved with sunscreen. we always have a lot of questions for things that puzzle or scare us. It is those questions that lead one day to answers and cures. No question is a stupid question. Not to wonder,not to have hope for cures that would be stupid. Don't stop living life but remember moderation and dreams become realities through the wonderment of questions.

Answer 4

I'm now not definite if God's identify was once eliminated from the Bibledeliberately with a view to create confusion, or if it is in keeping with the authorized doctrines... deprogramminger Bibles, the creation explains that wherein the tetragrammaton was once within the usual textual content, the translators used the phrase LORD, all caps, while the phrase Lord with simply the L capitalized is there while anybody mentioned Jesus as Lord. One intro I learn exact that the YHWH was once changed with LORD with a view to fulfill the Hebrew notion/superstition that the truly identify of God was once too sacred to utter. So at any time when studying the Bible, be conscious that anywhere you spot the phrase LORD, that's wherein God's specific identify was once within the usual. My notion is that, if His identify was once within the Bible a few thousand occasions, that implies it was once deemed most important, so we must now not reduction it. However, Jesus is on no account, so far as I understand, referrred to through the YHWH (or LORD). That is side of why I can't be given the trinity idea... Yes, utilising LORD and Lord confuses the limitation. Perhaps, due to the fact that the trinity idea was once carried out/authorized within the fourth century AD as church doctrine, and the KJV was once translated centuries later, it could had been performed that method with a view to comply with the authorized idea of the trinity. But even then, there was once the differentiation made among LORD and Lord, so folks who honestly take some time, can discover the reality and repair God's identify to its rightful situation within the scriptures... And no, I do not consider that Anglicizing His identify to Jehovah is suitable.

Answer 5

Cancer is IDIOPATHIC..meaning no known cause. BUT human research proved that there are some predisposing factors THAT could lead to cancer. Like..LUNG CANCER-smoking..SKIN CANCER- UV rays/ Sun exposure...BUT these are just predisposing factors, if there is way to prevent it (like eating the right food/diet/herbal) then you may not get it even you're a chronic smoker. Hope this is the answer you are looking for. Well you don't have to believe what everybody tells you but it does not hurt when you at least know something about it than take the risk. :) Go d bless!

Answer 6

I am no longer definite if God's identify used to be removed from the Bibledeliberately as a way to create confusion, or whether or not it's in line with the permitted doctrines... Deprogramminger Bibles, the introduction explains that where the tetragrammaton was in the usual text, the translators used the phrase LORD, all caps, whereas the phrase Lord with simply the L capitalized is there when anybody pointed out Jesus as Lord. One intro I read distinct that the YHWH was replaced with LORD with the intention to satisfy the Hebrew notion/superstition that the actual name of God was once too sacred to utter. So every time reading the Bible, be conscious that at any place you see the word LORD, that's the place God's precise identify used to be within the long-established. My notion is that, if His name was in the Bible a number of thousand occasions, that means it used to be deemed fundamental, so we should not discount it. However, Jesus is in no way, as far as i do know, referrred to with the aid of the YHWH (or LORD). That is part of why I can't receive the trinity thought... Yes, utilising LORD and Lord confuses the difficulty. Probably, considering the fact that the trinity theory was applied/accredited in the fourth century advert as church doctrine, and the KJV used to be translated centuries later, it would were carried out that way in an effort to follow the authorised thought of the trinity. However even then, there used to be the differentiation made between LORD and Lord, so individuals who truely take some time, can in finding the reality and repair God's identify to its rightful location within the scriptures... And no, i do not consider that Anglicizing His name to Jehovah is acceptable.

Answer 7

Unfortunately, if people would smoke, use deodorant, dye their skin with fake tan, and dye their hair in moderation, they probably would never cause them to have cancer....

...But people have no sense so every time their is a lawsuit, we get some stupid warning.

...the word is moderation....
...and by the way, what is dangerous today will be what they are telling you to do tomorrow....case in point, now getting a natural tan is healthier for you than getting a tan at a tanning booth...gee

...and that some amounts of nicotine prevents heart disease,..@@:)

I don't know about you, but I'm keeping my "deodorant"..HA!!!

Answer 8

These products and more can lead to cancers. Even using toilet paper that is frangranced and print can contribute to bowel cancers. However, in saying this, it is happening over a course of years. No it is no a trend. We are told that eating a piece of meat which has been burnt can contibute to cancer, not necessarily cause it. So when you put all these products together yes, the risks are significantly higher.

Answer 9

Everyone one has a theory, because cancer is scary and for those of us who have it, we'd like to know why. I wondered about everything from chemicals I might have been exposed to on military bases to photo developing chemicals I used years ago. My theories might be annoying, but at least I'm a nice person. You're NOT! It's a shame that people who deserve it don't get cancer.

Answer 10

i'm uncertain if God's call became faraway from the Bibledeliberately with a view to create confusion, or whether that's based on the regular doctrines... deprogramminger Bibles, the creation explains that the place the tetragrammaton became interior the unique textual content textile, the translators used the be conscious LORD, all caps, while the be conscious Lord with merely the L capitalized is there while somebody talked approximately Jesus as Lord. One intro I study special that the YHWH became replaced with LORD with a view to fulfill the Hebrew concept/superstition that the genuine call of God became too sacred to utter. So each and every time analyzing the Bible, be conscious that anyplace you notice the be conscious LORD, that's the place God's actual call became interior the unique. My concept is that, if His call became interior the Bible a number of thousand cases, meaning it became deemed substantial, so we would desire to continuously no longer decrease value it. although, Jesus is on no account, so a approaches as i comprehend, referrred to by the YHWH (or LORD). that's a factor of why i will't settle for the trinity concept... specific, making use of LORD and Lord confuses the subject. possibly, through fact the trinity concept became carried out/regular interior the fourth century advert as church doctrine, and the KJV became translated centuries later, it ought to have been accomplished that way with a view to stay with the regular concept of the trinity. yet even then, there became the differentiation made between LORD and Lord, so people who truly make the complication, can locate the actuality and fix God's call to its rightful place interior the scriptures... And no, i do no longer think that Anglicizing His call to Jehovah is acceptable.