Jesus was a rebel. Long before rock and roll. He tor up temples, defied Cesar and the Romans, riped curtains, and much more. What a guy. When he comes back, it will be on a Harley and he will have leather.
2006-07-30 14:05:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, and who said he walked on water in Connecticut anyway? I would think there is a difference in breaking a life jacket law and sinning.
2006-07-30 21:17:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by 12nanny 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No jesus didn't wear a life-jacket because he was confident with his own abilities and it wasn't in connecticut, it was in isreal.
have a nice day.
2006-07-30 21:25:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lila 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
but by walking on water, from his point of view it was practically solid ground, and he therefore was exempt from the law. that and he was quite a long way from connecticut, which didn't even exist then anyway, so the law wasn't around.....
so anyway - no he didn't sin
2006-07-30 21:06:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by visionary 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus walked on water in ancient Israel, not Connecticut
2006-07-30 21:12:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hehehehehe.....
Yes, i think a same thing too. Maye Jesus wearing a life jacket. He afraid of being sink. And also, the holy-man will ever saw their ability in front of the mass, except in the urgent condition.
I`m a little bit doubt if Yesus madea that thing.
-Just beliefe in your believe-
2006-07-30 21:07:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Double Helix 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He wasn't in Connecticut at the time... so he didn't break any laws
2006-07-30 21:06:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, not a life jacket. He had two orange floaters on his arms. You know, he couldn't swim.
I was told he looked real cute with the floaters, though.
2006-07-31 12:17:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by bloody_gothbob 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I didn't know breaking man-made laws was sinful.
2006-07-30 21:10:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by swm_seeks_sf 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe he walked on the waters of his own luxury swimming pool. I'm sure doing that on his own property wasn't illegal :)
2006-07-30 21:04:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋