the news this week that all of Dakotas crops are destroyed because of heat, West Nile virus as far west as Washington etc
2006-07-30 12:03:37 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
Many conservatives will tell you it's just coincidence that these events are unfolding. They will tell you it is a trend. And if they are true conservatives, they would not want the government paying to help people with storms.
And as far as saying "dump the car, then we'll talk". That's a simple statement. Because we are part of the problem, does not mean we can not be concerned with the issue. It will take government regulation to create change. Raising cafe standards (mpg for manufactures) would help.
We also rolled back laws requiring power companies to upgrade power plants when they made renovations to the plants, so they were basically able to rebuild entire plants without bringing them up to new standards. It's part of Cheneys secret energy policy.
2006-07-30 12:45:54 · answer #1 · answered by Steve R 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Conservatives complain about the cost of taking care of the environment because they want you to pay for that, not them.
They open a business to make money not be good and decent. They want to be free to pollute the site and then walk away and let you pay for the clean up. Mexico has a big problem now because manufactures went there to avoid our Environmental laws. Some people are not smart enough to connect the dots. Hurricanes are caused when hot air hits cold air over the oceans. Republicans claim this is bad science and only used to scare people. I call it global warming and so do the 1200 scientist that study Global Warming.
BTW, Howard Dean seems to scare allot of Republicans, I wonder why that is, could it be that he is truthful?
I do not use pesticides or herbicides but many Conservatives i know use them. They seem to love them more than Mother Earth.
2006-07-30 12:27:48 · answer #2 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question does not make much sense. If I understand what you are saying, there is the implication that spending money on the environment will prevent hurricanes, stop heat waves in the Dakotas and stop West nile Virus in Washigton. Just how is this going to work?
2006-07-30 12:28:44 · answer #3 · answered by » mickdotcom « 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Conservatives do not complain about the cost of taking care of the environment. The object to 'environmental' regulations that don't help the environment based on unproven claims. If we didn't break it, why should we pay billions to stop breaking it?
2006-07-30 13:59:02 · answer #4 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since conservatives complain about the cost of taking care of the environment, what about cost of hurricanes?
AMEN!!!!
You GO brother♥!
2006-07-30 15:04:24 · answer #5 · answered by Kiss my Putt! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What does the heat wave have to do with Hurricanes. Ohhhh I get it, you must Howard dean. That ranting lunatic. How goes it bud? I see you're off your meds again.
2006-07-30 12:07:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You assume that conservatives are against the environment. Do you drive a car? Dump the car, then we will talk.
2006-07-30 12:17:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
thermonuclearwarfare.com
some answers, more questions aldo
geocities.com/shakwa
might have answer
2006-07-30 14:07:54 · answer #8 · answered by Shakwa 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋