Were there instances in the past where, to deter suicide bombers, the policy was for that government to kill the bombers' families? Since suicide bombers often thought their acts would benefit their families, this acted as a good deterrent?
2006-07-30 09:04:38 · 6 answers · asked by presidentrichardnixon 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
That would turn their families into martyrs....and us into monsters. Completely unacceptable.
2006-07-31 13:34:51 · answer #1 · answered by tyrsson58 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When you realize that the bombers care nothing for humanity other than there own. They probably won't react to the relatives and children being killed. You and I would chase childeren away if we thought what we were doing might get the children hurt, but these fanatics are interested only in their agenda and the cowards have no problem using childeren as shields... so I support the premise that the only way to kill terrorists is to go after him and do your best to try and avoid civilian casualties. To lend credence to the arguement would to be to bend over and kiss your *** good bye.
2006-07-30 16:42:10 · answer #2 · answered by Britton J 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That wouldn't do anything. They would find a new way to recruit them. More than likely by religious means. They need to hire assasins for terrorist groups is what they need to do.
2006-07-30 16:43:29 · answer #3 · answered by Greg 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think I could get behind that way of deterrent rather quickly
2006-07-30 16:12:21 · answer #4 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they need to bury suicide bombers with pigs
2006-07-30 16:08:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
terrorist scum
2006-07-30 16:09:51 · answer #6 · answered by 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋