Evolution is true. Life has a common ancestor. Denying this is VANITY and a sin?

Question

God would disapprove of denying the truth, whatever it may be.

edsawyer, I ran out of original things to say the first month I was on here. I just want to put my shoulder to the cart with everyone else.

Answer 1

jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:28:15 PM): can you do me a favor?
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:28:24 PM): please delete that answer you gave thats a big long cut and paste,
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:28:25 PM): thanks
h (7/30/2006 2:28:36 PM): nope.
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:28:55 PM): wouldnt it be the christian thing to do
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:28:56 PM): the loving thing
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:28:58 PM): won't you love me
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:29:01 PM): please please
h (7/30/2006 2:29:18 PM): nope. The Christian thing to do os to love veryone by telling the Truth.
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:29:32 PM): ok, well, i cant talk to you anymore
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:29:32 PM): bye
h (7/30/2006 2:29:39 PM): you're welcome to delete your question, though.
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:29:44 PM): no my question stands
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:29:49 PM): people who deny evolution are liars
h (7/30/2006 2:29:50 PM): as does my answer.
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:29:55 PM): and im tryiing to find the real god
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:29:59 PM): and since evolution is real
h (7/30/2006 2:30:00 PM): no ou're not.
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:30:06 PM): the true god must have used evolution
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:30:06 PM): so
h (7/30/2006 2:30:07 PM): evolution is not real.
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:30:09 PM): yes it is
h (7/30/2006 2:30:13 PM): no it's not.
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:30:26 PM): what about the plants that cant mate with their geneitic ancestors
h (7/30/2006 2:30:40 PM): what about them? how does that prove evolution?
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:30:49 PM): well cause they are plants that geneitically evolved
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:30:51 PM): but heh
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:30:54 PM): its nice talking to you
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:31:00 PM): i can't talk to you anymore
h (7/30/2006 2:31:01 PM): If evolution were true, I can't mate with my ancestors, lizards.
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:31:08 PM): wait
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:31:10 PM): you got it
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:31:12 PM): you understand
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:31:15 PM): you can't mate with lizards
h (7/30/2006 2:31:32 PM): because we're not the same kind of animal. has nothing to do with evolution.
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:31:38 PM): well yes it does actually
h (7/30/2006 2:31:45 PM): how?
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:31:50 PM): you just proved my point
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:32:07 PM): can i cut and paste this into the details of the question?
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:32:10 PM): to show i converted you?
h (7/30/2006 2:32:46 PM): you can cut and paste anything you like, but include that you did not convert me.
h (7/30/2006 2:32:58 PM): else you'd continue to lie.
h (7/30/2006 2:33:10 PM): like all evolutionists.
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:33:14 PM): well
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:33:17 PM): according to what is it
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:33:20 PM): 1 john 2:22
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:33:24 PM): its not even all evolutionists
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:33:30 PM): but anyone who doesnt share your religion
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:33:32 PM): isnt that correct
h (7/30/2006 2:33:33 PM): why would you even quote the bible?
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:33:35 PM): well
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:33:38 PM): why not
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:33:45 PM): its your truth isnit
h (7/30/2006 2:33:45 PM): you obviously don't believe it.
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:34:04 PM): just the literal believe of genesis 1:26-27 and genesis 2:7
h (7/30/2006 2:34:05 PM): I can qupte it becuae it is my truth. You can't because it's a fairy tale to you.
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:34:23 PM): well i saw the movie troy
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:34:27 PM): but i dont believe in zeus
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:34:27 PM): so
h (7/30/2006 2:34:38 PM): well then it must be true, cuz Hollywood never lies, right?
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:34:53 PM): and don't forget romans 1:28-31, since i dont share your religion, im a murderous theif or something
h (7/30/2006 2:34:56 PM): God is bigger than holywood
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:35:04 PM): didn't hollywood produce that last temptation
h (7/30/2006 2:35:11 PM): I'm a murderous thief, so that doesn't make you special.
h (7/30/2006 2:35:18 PM): No. Mel Gibson did.
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:35:25 PM): lol
h (7/30/2006 2:35:28 PM): oh wait, diff movei
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:35:30 PM): ok, nice talking to you
h (7/30/2006 2:35:51 PM): was it?
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:35:53 PM): no
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:35:56 PM): i meant passion
h (7/30/2006 2:35:56 PM): liar
h (7/30/2006 2:36:08 PM): yeah, passion was produced by mel gibson.
h (7/30/2006 2:36:50 PM): but that doesn't make it true either. Truth is true, period. doesn't matter who said it, except for God.
h (7/30/2006 2:37:02 PM): If God says it, it's true.
h (7/30/2006 2:37:10 PM): ANything else is suspect.
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:37:10 PM): what about revelations 7:1-3
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:37:16 PM): sorry
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:37:18 PM): its revelation
h (7/30/2006 2:37:19 PM): what about it?
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:37:21 PM): i hate when people do that
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:37:24 PM): call it revelations
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:37:26 PM): its revelation
h (7/30/2006 2:37:50 PM): feel free to write to me. gotta go now.
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:37:54 PM): what about revelation 7:1-3 and revelation 20:8
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:37:58 PM): that earth isnt flat
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:38:02 PM): i cant write you
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:38:08 PM): the email failed on yahoo
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:38:11 PM): thats why i had to im you
h (7/30/2006 2:38:17 PM): [e-mail]
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:38:35 PM): live long and propser, may his noodly appendage touch you
h (7/30/2006 2:38:55 PM): brilliant. clearly a brainiac.
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:39:05 PM): well its like paul said
jim darwin (7/30/2006 2:39:11 PM): im some murderous beast or something

Answer 2

It is a sin to state that Evolution is true when God has given the entire universe as evidence of His existence. Human life has a common ancester in Adam not rocks that appeared from nothing. The fact that human life has a common ancestor in Adam proves God is the creator and designer of the universe. Denying God's Truth when he has caused us to know it is a vanity and sin.

Answer 3

What kind of evolution do you mean? Are you aware that there is more than one kind?

Microevolution -- change within a species, or subspeciation -- is true and scientifically proven. Microevolution is what Darwin observed on the Galapagos, and from that he formulated his theory on macroevolution. That's a bit of unsound science that wouldn't have gone over so well if it hadn't happened to coincide with a political agenda that was prevalent at the time (namely, Darwin's theories were perverted into a justification for European colonialism).

Macroevolution -- evolution that creates new species, and what most of us have been conditioned to think of when we hear the word "evolution" -- is still theoretical. Modern paleontologists no longer believe that natural selection is what brings this about. The going theory involves something called Punctuated Equilibrium, which postulates that periods of natural selection (equilibrium) are punctuated by sudden mutations that result in new species.

Answer 4

I urge you to use discernment, reason and logic when thinking aobut evolution- all the things evolutionists accuse us of not using , but really- do the principles of evolution make sense? If this has taken place over the course of millions of years, little by little, then we are being decieved when we are told we are looking for "the missing link" we are looking for millions of missing links- besides that- there are so many common sense, scientific questions that evolution just cannot answer- no matter how you twist it.
If you are really interested in education and not just disproving something that does not fit your mold- read this article, it is fun reading but very informative and common sense-
Meet Gaspy: the lungfish:

http://www.reflecthisglory.org/study/did...

here are other bits of interesting fact for you to ponder :

Charles Dawson, a British lawyer and amateur geologist announced in 1912 his discovery of pieces of a human skull and an apelike jaw in a gravel pit near the town of Piltdown, England . . . Dawson's announcement stopped the scorn cold. Experts instantly declared Piltdown Man (estimated to be 300,000 to one million years old), the evolutionary find of the century. Darwin's missing link had been identified. Or so it seemed for the next 40 or so years. Then, in the early fifties . . . scientists began to suspect misattribution. In 1953, that suspicion gave way to a full-blown scandal: Piltdown Man was a hoax . . . tests proved that its skull belonged to a 600-year-old woman, and its jaw to a 500-year-old orangutan from the East Indies." Our Times--the Illustrated History of the 20th Century (Turner Publishing, 1995, page 94).

Science Fiction
The Piltdown Man fraud wasn't an isolated incident. The famed "Nebraska Man" was built from one tooth, which was later found to be the tooth of an extinct pig. "Java Man" was found in the early 20th Century, and was nothing more than a piece of skull, a fragment of a thigh bone and three molar teeth. The rest came from the deeply fertile imaginations of plaster of Paris workers. "Heidelberg Man" came from a jawbone, a large chin section and a few teeth. Most scientists reject the jawbone because it's similar to that of modem man. Still, many evolutionists believe that he's 250,000 years old. No doubt they pinpointed his birthday with good old carbon dating. Now there's reliable proof. Not according to Time magazine (June 11, 1990). They published an article in the science section that was subtitled, "Geologists show that carbon dating can be way off." Don't look to "Neanderthal Man" for any evidence of evolution. Recent genetic DNA research indicates the chromosomes do not match those of humans. They do match those of bipedal primates (apes).

What does Science Say?
Here are some wise words from a few respected men of science: "Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless." (Professor Louis Bounoure, Director of Research, National Center of Scientific Research). "Evolution is unproved and unprovable." (Sir Arthur Keith--he wrote the foreword to the 100th edition of, Origin of the Species). "Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever." (Dr. T. N. Tahmisian, Atomic Energy Commission, USA).

"To suppose that the eye . . . could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree." Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species

A great resource for some education that is logical and common sense is called "The Science or Evolution: expand your mind" You can get this DVD from WayoftheMaster.com

Answer 5

Elmo? Is that you, honey?

Life has a common Originator.

God is the commonality. Sort of like Jim Henson is the commonality for the Muppets. He's the Creator and Designer.

I hope Jim made you out of flame retardant fibers. But just in case, get away from that fire! ;o)

Answer 6

I believe in evolution. God said let there be light and BAM there was light. He made the fish of the sea and the birds of the air. then made creatures to roam the earth. Yes they did evolve and than he made man and woman, some a little brighter than others.

Answer 7

Micro-evolution is true. Macro-evolution has never been proven or witnessed. The common ancestors of all of us are Adam, Eve, Noah, and his wife. I don't deny what I have just stated.

Answer 8

This is true,but mans greatest knowledge is Gods foolishness,and one day to God is A thousand years here on earth.....so evolution is possible,that's just how he made things big deal...

Answer 9

To the poster who said that there is evidence for creation: I personally challenge you to post one falsifiable hypothesis that tests creation. A hypothesis that would, if disproven, would also disprove creation, without anyone being able to come along and explain it away after the fact.

You can't.

Answer 10

Be sure to explain your theory to God on Final Judgement Day.