English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

An introduction to an infinite amount of knowledge one can learn. They have to make it an introduction because knowledge comes with responsibility. The wisdom must be there. We can't all kinds of people running around trying to learn this stuff without understanding what they are capable of. But most of those guys probably wouldn't watch the movie unless they were ready to change.

2006-07-30 06:46:24 · answer #1 · answered by Corey 4 · 1 0

One word: Ramtha.

This movie was written by, directed by, and produced by people affiliated with a woman who claims to channel a 35,000 year old warrior spirit from Lemuria. Most of the "experts" in the movie are on Ramtha's payroll, and the real experts were edited to imply that they supported the bad science, when in fact they did not.

(From the wiki on "what the bleep")
David Albert, a philosopher of physics and professor at Columbia University, speaks frequently throughout the movie. While it may appear as though he supports the ideas that are presented in the movie, according to a Popular Science article, he is "outraged at the final product." The article states that Albert granted the filmmakers a near-four hour interview about quantum mechanics being unrelated to consciousness or spirituality. His interview was then edited and incorporated into the film in a way that misrepresented his views. In the article, Albert also expresses his feelings of gullibility after having been "taken" by the filmmakers.

2006-07-30 13:55:04 · answer #2 · answered by Big_Drew 3 · 0 0

The animation was the best part of the whole movie being that it was quite funny. Unfortunately it was all too short. Mostly there were a lot talking heads. I would have found the concepts more interesting if I was not already familiar with them. Novelty goes a long way when you have spend length amounts of time watching talking heads. The story line was OK but nothing fantastic. I think it a worth while movie for any adult to see. Again it depends on your prior knowledge and predilection as to how much you will like this movie.

2006-07-30 13:49:02 · answer #3 · answered by Love of Truth 5 · 0 0

New age "quantum" nonsense. New agers love that work, quantum...anything they run out of other vague terms to describe, they call it quantum, and then look at you real smug, like they've just won the argument.

New agers are just as pathetic in their non-sensical beliefs as every other religion. It's all fairy tales and wizard dust

It is really really really bad science.
Deepak Chopra bad
Andrew Weil bad

2006-07-30 13:46:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I loved the movie. It is an excellent way of opening your mind to consider alternate possibilities. Things that, in everyday life seem so far removed from our perceived reality. It is nice to think that this may just be one dimension in a reality that contains multitudinous possibilies. I like to think that all results of all possible outcomes of all possibilities are being experienced simultaneously in infinite dimensions of reality. It is mind-boggling to imagine!

2006-07-30 13:45:57 · answer #5 · answered by LindaLou 7 · 0 0

All science is "bad science".

Anyhow, I liked it. I could have done without the "comedy" parts as they just came off as trite and unnecessary to me. The "documentary" type parts were interesting and some things that the speakers mentioned were new to me and made me do some research of my own.

2006-07-30 13:48:45 · answer #6 · answered by the_old_black 2 · 0 0

I read the book, actually. And own the books.

It's wonderful. I love Quantum Physics.

:D It helps prove Paganism.

- 16 yo Pagan

2006-07-30 13:43:43 · answer #7 · answered by Lady Myrkr 6 · 0 0

I have always thought that so-called reality did not exist external to the mind of the perciever.

It was great to see that others had noticed this too.

2006-07-30 13:48:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Absolutely great movie!

2006-07-30 13:49:14 · answer #9 · answered by aldiaz2wheare 3 · 0 0

It's kind of amusing, but it's really bad science.

2006-07-30 13:45:36 · answer #10 · answered by Sandsquish 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers