Best way to solve Global Warming, realistically?

Question

In my opinion if Al Gore was elected for President in the US global warming wouldnt be a problem, the US would easily combat it and sign the Kyoto treaty and then many other countries would follow on... Any ideas?

Answer 1

Although America NEEDS to sign the Kyoto agreement, we also have to think about emerging economies such as China and India that are using increased amounts of fossil fuels.

I do not believe that 1 country alone can solve global warming. Every single person in the world must play a part.

Firstly, people need to be educated and encouraged to adopt environmentally friendly lifestyles. For instance, people who have solar panels etc should be given tax breaks.

Our respective governments also need to do more to find alternatives to fossil fuels. Everyone needs to lobby tony and his cronies.

Answer 2

Well Bush does have a lot of interests in oil. The question is really a lot deeper than just changing the president though as the whole infulstructure of the worlds transport systems (or at least fuel) needs to change - but yes the USA really are holding the reins on this one.

There are thoughts that we have already gone too far and global warming or climate change is inevitable now.

Due to global dimming the warming would get worse before it got better too for a time. Exhaust fumes especially from aircraft cause the suns rays to be slighly blocked if we suddenly switched fuels this would stop and we would get warmer for a time. That said think about the build of heat that is happening dimming is going to have to stop one day and when they day comes.....

Answer 3

No way. Control CO² emissions will take too long (and too much) and would block any possibility to an economic boost in the next 100 years. World are already fighting against economic colapse.

You do not solve but, but survive it. Instead to discuss how to stop, countries should do like UK, just start to build defense plan and loss management.

Preparing alternatives and impact management plans (new crop cultures, new researches to get drinkable water).

Stop everything means change a lot of things but nothing shows that the process is reversible. Really, maxium would reduce actual rate but not the problem.
Rice fields in USA and Asia have somekind of bacterias that produces methan, industries would produce more and more. Melting areas in Siberia are increasing greenhouses.

Even if we would have several Vulcanoes explosions putting enough particles within the atmosphere reducing, it would not stop ot.

Worst is just see people argue without set up contigency plans.

Answer 4

Al Gore is getting more accomplished now than he would have been able to as president.

As for the Best way, it depends on what you mean by 'best'. Life thrives on a warmer climate, so we're actually doing life in general a favor by raising the temperature. Best for humanity is research alternative fuels ASAP to cut down on carbon emissions, then export that tech to developing countries (india china etc). Especially interesting is a spanish discovery to turn plankton into crude oil, but we'll see if that pans out into anything.

Best most effective regardless of consequenses is set off several thermonuclear weapons to increase the amount of dust in the atmosphere and block the sun's rays. Nuclear winter would stop global warming dead in its tracks.

Answer 5

There is no "realistic" way to solve global warming. If carbon emisions reached neutrality (i.e. no more carbon dioxide is realesed than can be neutralised) was reached tomorrow then global warming would still happen for a few years, because of the carbon dioxide that is in the atmosphere now. The ONLY way to stop global warming is to completely change society. Instead of buisiness saying "if it makes money do it" it would have to say "if it is environmentaly suitable" and then "if it makes money do it". Cars would have to be taken off the roads in their thousands, all fossil fuel power stations would have to be got rid of, and deforestation would have to immediately stop and be reversed.

Can you ever see this happening? No politician will ever say that, plus the fact that the Democrats are more conservative (and therefore more in the pocket of big buisiness) than most European conservative parties doesn't help either.

Answer 6

There is no Best way to solve Global warming but there are several ways which should be followed simultaneously.
1. Use solar power 2. Use nuclear power 3. Stop deforestation.
4. recycle wastes 5. Stop or regulate population boom. 6. Stop wastage of food. 7. Limit use of fossil fuel 8. Improve technology to use wind power, Tidal power etc.

Answer 7

There is really no solution to the problem. Cuting down CO2, CO and sulphur emissions might have a temporary effect, but it would be like dropping a stone in a puddle. It would only alter the pattern of cold and warm cycles. You can't outsmart nature. The earth is always trying to balance itself out.

Answer 8

i doubt that we can reduce global warming. the problem is people, our population is expanding and each person wants to consume resources. on top of this the under developed world wants to use more resources to develop further and as they do the people there use more as they become richer. in our efforts to feed more and more people we damage the environment more and more, cutting down the rain Forrest's and taking all life from the sea. as our population grows the more impact we will have. oddly, the only person that can have an effect is the pope. and he will not condone condoms. so perhaps you next question should be........... any one for soylent green?

Answer 9

The best realistic way is to move fifty miles inland. Nothing that we do is going to be able to affect the situation in our lifetimes, and we will have to move inland anyway.

Even if we were magically able to eliminate everything that we have done since we started rubbing sticks together, it would not stop or change because it is caused by the Sun, not anything we do. You seem more reasonable and more intelligent than Al Gore. For more information, please refer to my previous Best Answers on this and related topics.

Answer 10

environmentalist try to spotlight maximum of those issues yet its demanding because there are plenty. the placement with fixing international warming is that you could't merely turn a swap to renounce it. no remember what we do now, international warming will proceed for the subsequent 1000 years. our movements now can make the impact a lot less detrimental. even if the culminating damage of international warming ought to correctly be thousands of years away, the consequences (like the melting ice caps) aren't any further too a techniques off.