English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

if so why?

If this isn't the case why do they support israel's over agressive attacks which have needlessly killed lebabnese civilians and 4 U.N members on purpose after the people responsible were told that the U.N people were still in harms way. Why oh why oh why?

I'm not a history buff (and I know the UK is responsible for creating the agressive israel today) but I know that big wars don't just happen over night but happen slowly after a series of events.

2006-07-30 06:35:16 · 20 answers · asked by wave 5 in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

I'm SORRY, when i say america I meant the usa government.

2006-07-30 06:44:01 · update #1

20 answers

America doesnt want a world war. lol

2006-07-30 06:37:36 · answer #1 · answered by Gothic Princess 2 · 0 0

With Mr Bush at the helm - what else would you expect? I think though that the West interferes too much with all of the situations. Let us get our own house in order before we try to do it to others. We can't even manage our own Health Service and get proper treatment for our own people! I believe that Nostradamus predicted that it would be the 'yellow people' that took over the world - maybe a racist remark but would you call Middle Easterners 'yellow'? Mind you, after the DaVinci Code I'm not at all sure that Nostradamus had any idea of what he was talking about. Yet another case of going up and reading your Bible - but also a case that humans are really such sad, greedy creatures. We can look to The Bible for the history - but it doesn't change the fact that the overwhelming force is greed - and I guess that the Bush Administration are possibly the greediest of the lot - for fame and notoriety if not for wealth.

2006-07-30 07:04:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Third world war started when Russia invaded Afganistan in the 1980s. Admittedly America did not help the situation. By funding Osama Bin Laden to form the Mujahudin into an attacking force supplying sphistcated weapory and millions of dollars. Their aim to bring down Russia a superpower. What the Americans unwittedly unleashed on the world was the Fundamentalist Muslim. And this war will last a long long time.

2006-07-30 06:58:39 · answer #3 · answered by lordcomplexity 2 · 1 0

America doesn't but George Bush does. There's money to be made from war. Watch JFK the movie and listen to Donald Sutherland explain about that. Worst thing is, we Brits will get dragged in by the puppet on a string Tony Blair. It's some bad ****

2006-07-30 07:10:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think most Americans want this but the people in power here have nearly unfettered control to make decisions that affect this situation. While no one nation is at fault for supporting what is happening in Isreal, nearly every large nation has some stake, overt or covert, in what is happening there. The nation most responsible, however, is Isreal, not the US.

2006-07-30 06:40:14 · answer #5 · answered by Onegoddess 2 · 0 0

The U.N. members that were kiled were killed because Hezbollah was using the position as cover.
It's called collateral damage, and it hapens in war.

Israel is not over agressive here any more than the U.K. was in defending itself from Germany in WWII.

2006-07-30 06:40:00 · answer #6 · answered by Hk45Tactical 2 · 0 0

definitely, the form of those that died in 9/11 exchange into approximately 3,000 Secondly, no nuclear weapons have been utilized in war with the aid of fact WWII finally, That being mentioned, The U.S. has purely been attacked with the aid of itself soil two times with the aid of fact the Civil war, Pearl Harbor AND 9/11, individuals are used to residing in a non violent and internally violent u . s ., perchance if we've been extra like Spain or England, that have been additionally attacked with the aid of The Taliban, we would by no ability have placed boots on the floor in Afghanistan or Iraq.

2016-10-08 12:08:21 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

i don't know about this president of crap and little buddies, but i'd kill not 2 have world war 3 in the middle east because thats where my parents & friends were all born and i never got to go there. and why the hell is lsrael blaming the WHOLE country of lebanon just because the government kidnapped a couple of soilders! they're making the whole country suffer! why couldn't those lebanese ppl be put in jail or something, not bomb the whole country!!!!!!!!!

2006-07-30 06:41:20 · answer #8 · answered by whataprincess! 2 · 0 0

I wish that you could say the Bush administration instead of American's because I am American and all I want is for everybody to get along. I know that sounds naive and childish but thta's what I want. I hate my governmet and what they are doing in the middle east but I can do nothing to stop it only hope it doesn't affect me and my family a little selfish I know but what else can I do?????

2006-07-30 06:41:34 · answer #9 · answered by Kookie M 5 · 0 0

This to me is a very interesting thought. What with Bush's Hippocritical stance on religious faith, maybe he is trying to be a pseudo prophet to bring about armageddon. Believing that he and his ilk will triumph and ascend to the kingdom of heaven. Camels and needles come to mind.

2006-07-30 07:03:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

a world war is needed this planet is overpopulated, we need to purge 30 % of life for the remaining 70% the middle east is a good place to start

2006-07-30 07:15:17 · answer #11 · answered by johnman142 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers