I have read many time that some of us really believe that the targets are always accurate.but the killings of civilians are because opponents are always hiding behind civilians. are they cowards and not trained and have no hearts for their own people. Or it just our propoganda to justify all our moves. tell me what type heart is required for me to see my own family to get burned and die to win this war.
2006-07-29 20:25:25 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
PEMPURADPUSS: i cnt believe all your crap. i have not said they are trained killer please read it all carefully.
2006-07-30 00:18:58 · update #1
This whole war is a scam, and don't you think that the folks we let out of Guantanimo won't seek vengeance.
Bush has screwed this country for generations to come.
2006-07-29 20:27:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Has there EVER been a war without civillian casualties?
That being said, our government and our military do not seem to understand
the nature of guerilla war - it increases the likely amount of collateral damage
done by any attempt by a large force against a smaller force.
At this point, I think it is the most effective way a small force with little
high-technology can keep a large force at bay. If the Americans just
didn't care about civiliians, we could have dropped a few atomic bombs
and I think most countries would have stopped fighting, don't you?
2006-07-30 03:32:40 · answer #2 · answered by Elana 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As you say they are trained to kill. Guns are put in their hands when they are five years old. That's all they know how to do, until they are shown otherwise, they think that's the way we all are, fighting and killing every day. Their religion tells them it's o.k to kill other people. The women have babies knowing they will grow up to be suicide bombers, and to them it's an honour. The families are looked after and treated very well for sacrificing their children. We have a difficult time accepting their ways, and if we had been born in their country, we would be the same as them, killing everyone who doesn't share their beliefs, foreigners, women, children, friends and family. There but for the grace of God.
2006-07-30 03:55:13 · answer #3 · answered by pampurredpuss 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It is because people like yourself do not condemn the cowards who use civilians as shields.
You let them get away with it - so in effect you share part of the blame for the deaths of those civilians.
2006-07-30 12:52:28 · answer #4 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is worse than you think!
Since the American government claims that there ARE no civilian casualties, not only do they refuse to provide medical supplies to hospitals to treat the "none existent" civilian casualties, but also, they declared one hospital that was publicising civilian casualty figures as "a propaganda machine" and used that as a justification to attack it.
2006-07-30 03:34:12 · answer #5 · answered by The Lone Gunman 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the targets are accurately targeted then you have genocide against the Lebanese people who have nowhere else to go. Looks like the Israelis are needing more land again.
2006-07-30 12:26:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its got nothing to do with bush or blair , we should let all who wants to fight go to a area and just kill each other and let all the rest of the people who dont give a fcuk about what they are arguing about get on with there lives.
2006-07-30 03:32:47 · answer #7 · answered by micky k 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its done in the streets of America daily and that is not war.
A lot of criminals get away with it.
I am not saying they were right but look in our back yards.
2006-07-30 03:39:45 · answer #8 · answered by cheeky chic 379 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
when asked, Hezbollah (I assume that's who you mean) have said they do not hide among civilians. Now that may be a lie, but they wouldn't be very popular among the Lebanese people if they really did that. my guess, it's propaganda.
2006-07-30 03:33:48 · answer #9 · answered by mad john 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋