What are your thoughts on the electoral college???

Answer 1

Without the Electoral College, candidates would completely ignore the smaller states, and large portions of the bigger states. The campaigns would concentrate on the large cities, would pander to THEIR needs, and say to hell with everyone else.

As originally laid out, the House, the Senate, and the President were each elected by different constituencies. This was part of the separation of powers. Sadly, the 17th Amendment transferred the Senate from it's original constituency of state legislatures, to popular vote, just like the House. If the electoral College were dona away with, (and it would take a constitutional amendment to do so) then all Federal elections would be by popular vote, and we would have a tyranny of the majority.

Answer 2

I heard it's a good school. ;)

The electoral college is one of the biggest factors that make us a republic. Without the electoral college we become a true democracy - that is, to have mob rule. True democracy turns into a dictatorship or crumbles under it's own weight. The only exception to this is when it's practiced in a very small group (less than a few hundred) where everyone has a chance to share their opinions.

Answer 3

The President originally had 3 cabinet offices. State, War, Treasury. The President is now in charge of 15 cabinet offices, and 6 "Cabinet level officials" whom have even more power than the cabinet officers.

The result: an Executive power that has vastly more control over more facets of our society than the Founders ever intended. Moreover, with the exception of the indirectly elected President, none of these powerful individuals are elected.

So even though the occupant in the Oval Office has more and more influence than ever over our lives, and is currently striving for more still and without oversight, the Presidential office is becoming less and less accountable to the people due to our arcane and ineffective electoral college system.

This untenable situation can't change quickly enough for the sake of continued liberty.

Answer 4

genuine, many human beings are ignorant. of course, maximum folk are no longer knowledgeable, inasmuch as they do no longer understand that the form of the form is a artwork of brilliance. The place of work of President isn't rapidly attained; it is fairly greater insulated from surprising whims of the hundreds and the tyranny of mob rule. Electors are chosen by using State Legislatures (those are rapidly voted), and in many cases the State Legislatures motel to generic vote to be sure who would desire to represent the State. The equipment isn't invisible. each and each state has 2 senators, regardless of inhabitants, would desire to we unload the Senate, too? (they are the rich ones, you understand.) And confident, super populations DICTATE coverage to much less populations daily of the week without this safety. inspect the California Water Wars. i'd additionally recommend a diligent analyzing of the Federalist Papers to comprehend why the Founders needed a democratic-republic. A learn of constitutional regulation became my head around on the subject. Like exams and balances, the electoral equipment is an element of the beginning place of the federal government. that's no longer a "bill of Rights" challenge, that's a structural challenge, and the State does not have ratified the form without it.

Answer 5

It's worked for 250 plus years, guess I really don't have any thoughts on it except that if less than 50% of eligible citizens vote, then at least a reasonable representation is taking place through the electoral college

Answer 6

It's ALL ****** UP!!!...We all kno the US government is corrupt. If it wasn't for the electoral college, George Bush wouldn't hav won the first time. Although everyone in the electoral college is Supposed to vote for whomever their state choose, this doesn't always happen. That's why we have sooooooooo many dumb motha ****** runnin our country 2day

Answer 7

the electoral college was a good idea. unfortanetelay it was not meant to represent the large population that we have now. ever since the baby boom many have been complaining.

Answer 8

the role it played in the 2000 election has disenchanted millions from taking part in the voting process. they know their vote doesn't count which is why we have less than 50% voter turnout. it's antiquated and irrelevant. always has been. it was developed as an elitist institution to keep the colonial rich in power. it's high time it was abolished.

Answer 9

our last 2 elections are proof to get rid of and go with the popular vote and fix the whole process.
elect who, we the people, elect. would be a good start.

Answer 10

It's antiquated. It nullifies the vast majority of votes.