I urge people to use discernment, reason and logic when thinking aobut evolution- all the things evolutionists accuse us of not using , but really- do the principles of evolution make sense? If this has taken place over the course of millions of years, little by little, then we are being decieved when we are told we are looking for "the missing link" we are looking for millions of missing links- besides that- there are so many common sense, scientific questions that evolution just cannot answer- no matter how you twist it.
If someone really interested in education and not just disproving something that does not fit their mold- this article is great, it is fun reading but very informative and common sense-
Meet Gaspy: the lungfish:
http://www.reflecthisglory.org/study/did...
here is another bit of interesting fact for you to ponder :
Charles Dawson, a British lawyer and amateur geologist announced in 1912 his discovery of pieces of a human skull and an apelike jaw in a gravel pit near the town of Piltdown, England . . . Dawson's announcement stopped the scorn cold. Experts instantly declared Piltdown Man (estimated to be 300,000 to one million years old), the evolutionary find of the century. Darwin's missing link had been identified. Or so it seemed for the next 40 or so years. Then, in the early fifties . . . scientists began to suspect misattribution. In 1953, that suspicion gave way to a full-blown scandal: Piltdown Man was a hoax . . . tests proved that its skull belonged to a 600-year-old woman, and its jaw to a 500-year-old orangutan from the East Indies." Our Times--the Illustrated History of the 20th Century (Turner Publishing, 1995, page 94).
Science Fiction
The Piltdown Man fraud wasn't an isolated incident. The famed "Nebraska Man" was built from one tooth, which was later found to be the tooth of an extinct pig. "Java Man" was found in the early 20th Century, and was nothing more than a piece of skull, a fragment of a thigh bone and three molar teeth. The rest came from the deeply fertile imaginations of plaster of Paris workers. "Heidelberg Man" came from a jawbone, a large chin section and a few teeth. Most scientists reject the jawbone because it's similar to that of modem man. Still, many evolutionists believe that he's 250,000 years old. No doubt they pinpointed his birthday with good old carbon dating. Now there's reliable proof. Not according to Time magazine (June 11, 1990). They published an article in the science section that was subtitled, "Geologists show that carbon dating can be way off." Don't look to "Neanderthal Man" for any evidence of evolution. Recent genetic DNA research indicates the chromosomes do not match those of humans. They do match those of bipedal primates (apes).
What does Science Say?
Here are some wise words from a few respected men of science: "Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless." (Professor Louis Bounoure, Director of Research, National Center of Scientific Research). "Evolution is unproved and unprovable." (Sir Arthur Keith--he wrote the foreword to the 100th edition of, Origin of the Species). "Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever." (Dr. T. N. Tahmisian, Atomic Energy Commission, USA).
"To suppose that the eye . . . could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree." Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species
A great resource for some education that is logical and common sense is called "The Science or Evolution: expand your mind" You can get this DVD from WayoftheMaster.com
2006-07-30 04:45:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a possibility. If you see how faster we are advancing with our technology the further we move ahead in time, it is possible. For example, if you know the history of the computer, you know that a few decades ago, the computer was as big as a room. Now, computers become obsolete within a year and they are small enough to carry around.
What's also possible is that early humanity was not into the same ways of life we were. They may have been living as we do, but recording history may not have been in their interest. Furthermore, humans may have recorded their history in different ways besides writing words down.
And by the way, humanity has existed for about 200,000 years
2006-07-29 12:57:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by vichussmith 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well took humanity a VERY LONG time before they started to speak let alone write. (we do have pretty cave pictures). Also most beginning societies did not have any method of writing that would last long enough for us to see it, and most were destroyed during the constant wars that forged civilization.
Maybe better way to say it is that only in past 5000 years did people evolve enough to create and maintain records that could survive this long.
2006-07-29 12:52:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The rate of technological advancement is exponential, before recorded history there was not much technology and the rate was very slow, but afterwards the rate of change gradually increased. Just look at now, 110 years ago, there were very few automobiles and nobody thought we would ever make a flying machine. Now we are sending objects all throughout or solar system and in about 5 years one of our satellites will be finally leaving the solar system.
2006-07-29 13:05:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by azmurath 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You made a really good point. But people don't want to really think about that. When we didn't have paper we always had Stone. When we didn't have a language we drew pictures. So when you don't have a record. We were not there! Hence, we were not made yet. So Evolution is a joke.
1 Corinthians 15:
39 All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds. 40 There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial: but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another.
2 Corinthians. 4:4
In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.
Jeremiah 10:12 - He has made the earth by His power, He has established the world by His wisdom, and has stretched out the heavens at His discretion.
1 Corinthians 2:
5 That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God. 6 Howbeit we speak wisdom among them that are perfect: yet not the wisdom of this world, nor of the princes of this world, that come to nought.
A Russian communist newspaper once explained that they did not need to teach atheism directly in their schools. The could accomplish the same purpose by teaching "the foundations of Darwinism." (HRQ, p. 63)
2 Peter 3:5 - For this they willfully forget: that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of water and in the water.
QUESTION: WHY IS THERE A MISSING LINK?
ANSWER: because it was NEVER THERE!
2006-07-30 06:10:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by mornings_sunshine 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
a million) in accordance to evolutionists, people developed from apes? people are apes via definition. Linnaeus categorized us as such and he became a creationist. 2) there are various shown data in technological know-how, yet evolution is in basic terms a thought. fake with the aid of a fake effect of the be conscious thought. A fact, in technological know-how, is a discrete factor to innovations. Theories connect data and clarify them. there is not any larger type than thought. 3) A transitional variety is a fossil of an animal this is a factor one species and area yet another. fake. All organisms are transitional. 4) The age of the earth is desperate via scientists entirely contained in the direction of the radioactive relationship of fossils ? The age of the Earth became desperate via relationship a meteor on the perception that the image voltaic device became all the comparable age. All different calculations in good shape the age found. 5) The medical approach starts off with a prediction and then looks for data to assist that prediction? It starts off with remark. Then a hypothesis is formed from that remark. After the hypothesis is formed, scientists seek for data to assist or falsify the hypothesis. 6) the thought of evolution contains the super Bang? fake. 7) To have confidence in evolution is to have confidence that life and matter got here from no longer something? fake.
2016-11-03 06:47:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by garion 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes and no.
While early man may have learned to verbally communicate with one another, communicating with written words was probably not a high priority for most. And probably not that easy either. Can you imagine, sitting down with pencil and paper and trying to come up with an independant script about what happened yesterday.
Now, instead of using the alphabet your familar with, come up with your own.
And take away your pencil and paper and find something more simple to use.
Now take what you have done and save it for the future.
I would say that early written history was waiting for the innovations of lasting writing tools and an alphabet.
2006-07-29 13:03:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by illuminostic_1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Did it take them 95,000 years to become civilized enough to record their history?"
Yes :(
Just think about how long evolution takes, millions of years. So things like walking on two feet, not having alot of hair, language, and writing took a looooong time to develop.
2006-07-29 12:47:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by rahidz2003 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you want to know how evolution and christianity can live together, read these following books. Your views may change on if both can live together peacefully.
The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief - Francis S. Collins
Mere Christianity - C. S. Lewis
2006-07-29 13:01:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bug's Mom 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Writing was only invented because of the need of agcrculture.
We have plenty of other records of humantiy (cave paitintings at 40,000 years, goddess figures 60,000, remains of settlements like Catal-Huyuk and Jericho at 10-12,000)
Look at all the artifacts including transitions in tools, art, pottery, setllemtns and genetic links. Human history is much longer
2006-07-30 18:44:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Brian D. 2
·
0⤊
0⤋