You seem to be sadly mistaken... This war has the lowest causlity rate of any military conflict America has ever been in...
and pepole who don't suport our boys in blue, green, tan, or white
( Thats Air Force, Army, Marines. Navy) are patheic and shouldn't even be able to concidered Americans.
These brave men and women aren't over there because they HAVE to ... their over there doing their JOB... to make the U.S. safe.
Its not a thing where they want to get shot at or to kill someone...
they signed up, raised their hand and said they would do it.
because they beleive in something bigger better then their patheic little hovel... and thanks to them we'll never have to worry about being slaughtered for our religon, never be told what job we have to do, what we think, what we do...
FREEDOM!!
2006-07-28 21:00:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by R.Elsedragon 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
The unnecessary war in Iraq should have been ended long back after atleast unleashing mass destruction of that country. Public opinion in the largest democracy has not been to an extent to prevail upon a Government to do what the people desire. Govt of the people, by the people and for the people?
VR
2006-07-28 20:57:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by sarayu 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
thank Bush for this bullshit. he's the one who lied to Amerika. if you do some research like i have, you will find some interesting facts about this war. Iraq did not "attack" us. Bush was wanting more land, he wanted another "united state". he needed 9/11 to happen so it wude not look like he was gonna attack another country. he set up 9/11, he made 18 hijackers commit suicide [theres a problem though, 9 of them are still alive], he blamed Muslim "terrorists" and used it as an excuse to attack Iraq. he claims he is "setting up" a government for them, what he is actually doing is setting up "our" new government in Iraq.
Iraq is soon to be our 51st state. watch, and in a few years, you'll see
2006-07-28 20:53:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Crack City Rocker 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unless the US government (or politicians) think like their opponents, militarily and politically, they will never win a war. Think of Vietnam, Somalia, Afghanistan and now Iraq. Bush should read Clausewitz on the theory of battles and understanding your opponent.
2006-07-28 21:02:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Scabius Fretful 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i assume the section that confounds maximum persons is the reality that, with a distinctive fantastic exception who could have had unterior motives, anybody gave the impression to be working jointly in team spirit, united in opposition to a special enemy, and then, all promptly, the persons you so aptly defined, went thoroughly partisan many times hardship and positioned their very own political objectives beforehand of the risk-free practices & risk-free practices of the country. To make concerns, worse, between the Republicans began behaving like they have been Democrats and were spening funds like a team of drunken liberals (sorry Uncle Teddy), and that was once compounded interior the path of the President's refusal to undertaking the veto pen as in many cases as he will could have. we've a impediment the region the frontrunning candidate on the left is a well-known and reputed criminal who, alongside inclusive of her husband, on no account observed a marketing campaign contribution that they does no longer obtain and who, alongside jointly together with her husband, could sell their very souls (if surely they got here prepared with souls) for a pair of money in bribes from the chinese language government. This harpie, and her fellow applicants, forgot their early expert-the USA stance and have suffered a convenience of memory because of the fact it relates to their in the previous speeches and vote. on the alternative component, we've the erstwhile former mayor of modern-day York, who's frequently the single candidate on the two component of the aisle with even a modicum of government experience. He ain't proper, even with the undeniable fact that he continues to be the advantageous determination accessible interior the industry.
2016-11-03 06:05:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This hell will only end when both sides realise the significance of the word called "LIFE"...until then u cn never expect any side to surrender....they themselves have to realise that how much they are missing and wht the hell they are causing..even for those who arent exactly connected with the controversy....lets hope for the best !!
2006-07-28 20:51:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not before American troops are out of Iraq.
The sooner the better for America, less casualties.
2006-07-28 20:59:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Saadi 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The war in Iraq will end when it halt into a great cease of stoppage into freezing without any motion.
2006-07-28 20:51:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Guide Giver of the West 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i don't know but it better end soon... Bush still has 2 years of office, and I'm scared that there might not be much of a world to live in by then.
2006-07-28 20:55:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by theboi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They will be out of iraq shortly after our pussy government comes to its senses and allows our forces to take the necesary steps to defend themselves and the noncombatants.
2006-07-28 20:50:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Stand-up Philosopher 5
·
0⤊
0⤋