English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

WHO DO YOU THINK?

2006-07-28 18:24:46 · 20 answers · asked by grrrrr 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

20 answers

Well, without Mohammed bin Laden wouldn't have had the Koran and his excuses to kill for.

2006-07-28 18:32:09 · answer #1 · answered by AdamKadmon 7 · 0 2

Mohamed took a chaos in the middle east and got some order and law in to it. It is only you bigotry that makes you think otherwise. The terrorists do their things in the name of Mohamed and Ala for the same reasons why the KKK does their things in the name of Jesus and God.

Saddam got the buses running on time and kept employment down even if it is at gunpoint. That's not much but it is something.

All Bin Ladin has ever done is terrorize, supply bombs, finance insurgencies and kill innocents as well as his enemy indiscriminately. He has never gotten people to improve anything that makes living better. He has never fed the hungry or gotten a house for the homeless. All he has ever done is destroy and hurt people. This is evil pure and simple by definition.

2006-07-28 18:34:13 · answer #2 · answered by eric l 6 · 0 0

Mohammed

2006-07-28 18:29:01 · answer #3 · answered by Nikki 5 · 0 0

permit's see. Osama grew to become right into a freedom fighter against the Soviets. Sadam Hussein grew to become right into a dictator put in place by using the U. S. government. The Prophet Mohammed grew to become right into a guy who inspired human beings for on the subject of the final one thousand years. all of them did some questionable issues. the genuine question is: are YOU a stable or an evil guy or woman? Do you think of of helping others, or do you think of that if somebody is death, this is their issue. See in case you will discover an answer on your guy or woman coronary heart.

2016-12-10 16:53:28 · answer #4 · answered by phylys 3 · 0 0

Bin Ladin, I'd say. But then, Saddam killed his country's own. Wait, so did Bush . . .

2006-07-28 18:28:42 · answer #5 · answered by *AstrosChick* 5 · 0 0

What difference does it make? One is in Hell now, and the other two are on their way unless they repent. So whether one was worse than the other won't matter a bit once the dust settles.

2006-07-28 18:34:05 · answer #6 · answered by BrotherMichael 6 · 0 0

All the same. All are just as guilty without Christ.


and yes, let's not judge. But look at what the Bible says

He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
(John 3:18 KJVR)

2006-07-28 18:27:38 · answer #7 · answered by I_Need_Help 3 · 0 1

I'm going outside the bounds of this question and say its you for writing such a hate charged question.

2006-07-28 18:33:33 · answer #8 · answered by Mr Hex Vision 7 · 0 0

I said "Whynotaskdon'" is the MOST EVIL man.

2006-07-28 18:33:49 · answer #9 · answered by George W. Bastard 1 · 0 0

I think they are Boothe grouse!!!! and totally evil~~ They suck and should not even be thought about.

2006-07-28 19:19:03 · answer #10 · answered by so sick of being broke 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers