English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

49 answers

No. It's not, Mother, and I'm trying. Jeez, why won't you just let me live my LIFE!

2006-07-28 16:09:22 · answer #1 · answered by JayD 3 · 0 0

My husband and I were 19 and 20 when we got married. We had both of our two children by the time we were 26 and 27. We have been married 26 years now, and I am still very happily married. Marriage is about commitment, not age. You have to go into the marriage with the attitude "This is my life partner. This person from now on is the most important person in my life. No matter what happens I will be there for this person." If the commitment is there, the age is inconsequential. It's more about the attitude. And let me tell you this. When you have that kind of commitment to each other, it makes the things in life easier to get through. Because no matter what happens and what life spits at you or what you go through that person will be there. That is truly comforting. I just had a major operation lately. I knew I wouldn't have to worry. I knew my husband would take care of me. It's nice to have that in your life and other things you might have to go through: loosing your job, depression etc. Marriage definitely has it's highlights. So, I say it's not age, it's level of commitment.

2006-07-28 16:16:27 · answer #2 · answered by makingthisup 5 · 0 0

It is the perfect time. I didn't want to be married until 30. I am now 37 and have 2 kids and 1 on the way.

2006-07-28 16:09:44 · answer #3 · answered by ninetythreeredcapri 2 · 0 0

yes that is way to young for a man. Men should get married at about 50 to a 19-25 year old woman. Then have kids.

2006-07-28 16:11:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

its perfect to get married from 30-35. Especially with the change of times, this isnt the 80s anymore. No wonder the divorce rate is so high, people arent mature enough under 30.

2006-07-29 14:29:36 · answer #5 · answered by juju 3 · 0 0

Are you kidding? I'm 27 and have been married for over 3 years. no kids yet... but 30 is pushing it. Women over the age of 30 have an increased risk of having children with down's syndrome... so you better get your sh*t together.

2006-07-28 16:12:02 · answer #6 · answered by shektbg 2 · 0 0

Actually 30 is just the right age for a man to get started building his family.

2006-07-28 16:11:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think it depends on the man and the woman he plans to marry, my husband is 30 and I am 25 and we have been married now for 5 yrs, and now I am trying to talk him into children, so it just depends.

2006-07-28 16:10:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

thats perfect! I'm 34 got married at 31; had 1st baby at 33!
That way you don't feel like you are missing out on anything in life and are somewhat financially set and secure! PS. My hubby was 30 when we married 32 when we had our son; will probly have another in a year or so

2006-07-28 16:11:38 · answer #9 · answered by nicci 2 · 0 0

30 for a man should be a great age. Most men has now past the immaturity age and would take parenting resposibilities more seriously!

2006-07-28 16:46:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No it's the perfect age. If you are happy with this person what should it matter your age. Some people get married at 18 now and have kids. I wish you good luck.

2006-07-28 16:10:01 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers