English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-28 12:43:41 · 16 answers · asked by @Mikey@Patino@ 1 in Family & Relationships Family

16 answers

twins.....triplets is too much

2006-07-28 12:46:23 · answer #1 · answered by Guy 3 · 0 1

Depends on how many other children you have...I prefer twins, since even numbers usually work out better (entertainment wise)..

For example, if I am going to Disneyland, and want to take the family on a ride, having triplets would make it difficult (would have to take more than one ride so each kid can enjoy it).

Triplets also cost a lot more money in early childhood with the diapers and baby food...Having twins and a single baby separately are actually cheaper than having three children at one time since the time to spend the money is lengthened.

Only few reasons...Have a lot more.

2006-07-28 12:47:49 · answer #2 · answered by pvdesi 2 · 0 0

Twins!

2006-07-28 12:46:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Twins.

2006-07-28 12:46:22 · answer #4 · answered by ::.Mz.Allure.:: 2 · 0 0

I would not want multiple birth but if I had to pick I would pick twins

2006-07-28 12:46:47 · answer #5 · answered by Missy 4 · 0 0

I think twins would be easier to raise. And at least you wouldn't always have one being left out when they're playing - can you imagine the constant fights?!? Enough to drive anyone mad!

2006-07-28 13:14:30 · answer #6 · answered by Foo Foo Girl 4 · 0 0

twins

2006-07-28 12:46:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

twins easier ti get two of a kind rather than one left out

2006-07-28 12:46:13 · answer #8 · answered by Elaine F 5 · 0 0

Probably triplets! That would be soo cool :)

2006-07-29 09:10:57 · answer #9 · answered by livelaughlove08 3 · 0 0

Triplets, because they are unique. I would only want them if they were adopted though. lol.

2006-07-28 12:48:40 · answer #10 · answered by Ricky 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers