English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

29 answers

Many things evolve, so in that sense, yes, evolution is a true process. Whether man evolved from a more primitive life..umm...yes (at least from earlier forms of humans...though the way some people act you'd think they hadn't evolved at all). It's an ongoing process as well.

2006-07-28 17:46:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes.

Interestingly enough, there have been two recent stories about animals recently evolving into two separate species. Up until then, I had not heard of anything going on currently. Obviously genes mutate, and if they mutate enough, and are viable mutations, you get a new species. I am not sure why some people do not understand that point.

Genes dictate the form and function of the life form. If genes can change, so does the life form. We know for a fact that genes change. That pretty much is all you need to prove evolution.

-Dio

2006-07-28 18:47:46 · answer #2 · answered by diogenese19348 6 · 0 0

some worship God some worship the devil, and some worship science.For the most part everyone thinks one of these are true. so let the ones that worship God study and learn about him and take part in all God has to offer. and the ones that believe in the devil do the same. and also the ones that believe in since. at the end of life we will all know the truth.are we can look for the truth while we are on earth and be open minded until we find the truth. I hope everyone finds the truth they are looking for and i have included this site as a place to start for some and a place to end for others that thank they know what is true good link http://the-heavenly-home-page.blogspot.com/

2006-07-28 20:22:50 · answer #3 · answered by marshall_blake2000 2 · 0 0

well, lets look at some FACTS:
I urge you to use discernment, reason and logic when thinking aobut evolution- all the things evolutionists accuse us of not using , but really- do the principles of evolution make sense? If this has taken place over the course of millions of years, little by little, then we are being decieved when we are told we are looking for "the missing link" we are looking for millions of missing links- besides that- there are so many common sense, scientific questions that evolution just cannot answer- no matter how you twist it.
If you are really interested in education and not just disproving something that does not fit your mold- read this article, it is fun reading but very informative and common sense-
Meet Gaspy: the lungfish:

http://www.reflecthisglory.org/study/did...

here are other bits of interesting fact for you to ponder :

Charles Dawson, a British lawyer and amateur geologist announced in 1912 his discovery of pieces of a human skull and an apelike jaw in a gravel pit near the town of Piltdown, England . . . Dawson's announcement stopped the scorn cold. Experts instantly declared Piltdown Man (estimated to be 300,000 to one million years old), the evolutionary find of the century. Darwin's missing link had been identified. Or so it seemed for the next 40 or so years. Then, in the early fifties . . . scientists began to suspect misattribution. In 1953, that suspicion gave way to a full-blown scandal: Piltdown Man was a hoax . . . tests proved that its skull belonged to a 600-year-old woman, and its jaw to a 500-year-old orangutan from the East Indies." Our Times--the Illustrated History of the 20th Century (Turner Publishing, 1995, page 94).

Science Fiction
The Piltdown Man fraud wasn't an isolated incident. The famed "Nebraska Man" was built from one tooth, which was later found to be the tooth of an extinct pig. "Java Man" was found in the early 20th Century, and was nothing more than a piece of skull, a fragment of a thigh bone and three molar teeth. The rest came from the deeply fertile imaginations of plaster of Paris workers. "Heidelberg Man" came from a jawbone, a large chin section and a few teeth. Most scientists reject the jawbone because it's similar to that of modem man. Still, many evolutionists believe that he's 250,000 years old. No doubt they pinpointed his birthday with good old carbon dating. Now there's reliable proof. Not according to Time magazine (June 11, 1990). They published an article in the science section that was subtitled, "Geologists show that carbon dating can be way off." Don't look to "Neanderthal Man" for any evidence of evolution. Recent genetic DNA research indicates the chromosomes do not match those of humans. They do match those of bipedal primates (apes).

What does Science Say?
Here are some wise words from a few respected men of science: "Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless." (Professor Louis Bounoure, Director of Research, National Center of Scientific Research). "Evolution is unproved and unprovable." (Sir Arthur Keith--he wrote the foreword to the 100th edition of, Origin of the Species). "Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever." (Dr. T. N. Tahmisian, Atomic Energy Commission, USA).

"To suppose that the eye . . . could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree." Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species

A great resource for some education that is logical and common sense is called "The Science or Evolution: expand your mind" You can get this DVD from WayoftheMaster.com

2006-07-30 22:51:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I believe creation, and evolution are both partially true. While it's evident that species go through evolutionary changes over the course of time, I believe that life was brought to earth from another planet, and that highly advanced beings (gods) did a great deal of genetic engineering experimentation with life forms on earth.

2006-07-28 19:31:56 · answer #5 · answered by oceansoflight777 5 · 0 0

on the side of the animals it is .
but about 300.000 years ago an extraterestrial race called Anunaki escaped a cosmic disastre and came too earth where they created the Adams race to mine gold for them .
Neanderthaler,cro-magnum.homo erectus ,etc all lived at the same time and where in the same place .as well as being in the same place of the oldest known gold mines in the world .
and these humanoids where results of their clonings and genetic experiments.
the bibles adam story was symbolic romantic rubbish.and the evolution theory did not work with the humans because it was not true.
but as far as flora and fauna are concerned yes

2006-07-28 18:48:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Language evolves,
The world revolves,
And there is a revolution
Against evolution.
Faith without reason
Thinks science is treason.
However,
Faith with reason accepts
Science precepts.
I side with those who think
we will find the missing link.

2006-07-28 22:26:42 · answer #7 · answered by frodo 6 · 0 0

Yes

2006-07-28 18:58:44 · answer #8 · answered by kano7_1985 4 · 0 0

Uh....No? Evolution isnt "real" persay, but it is the best THEORY going. At least, it beats beleiving in a sky pixie creation myth.

2006-07-28 18:46:49 · answer #9 · answered by YDoncha_Blowme 6 · 0 0

No, the world was created by God, about 7000 years ago.

Genetic mutations causes only malformations and deat

2006-07-28 18:48:59 · answer #10 · answered by pietro 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers