so if they get lost, it will be easier to identify them.
2006-07-28 09:16:58 · 91 answers · asked by Evilest_Wendy 6 in Family & Relationships ➔ Family
Or, would it be better to put it on their forhead?
2006-07-28 09:19:41 · update #1
Ok, calm down everyone, it's just a joke. I would never do something like that to my kids.
2006-07-28 09:27:33 · update #2
If you are worried about what kind of mom I really am, you can look at my blog:
http://skyriverranch.spaces.msn.com/
2006-07-28 09:29:28 · update #3
Oh, thats pretty funny! I would do it.
2006-07-28 10:12:19 · answer #1 · answered by Queen of the Dachshunds 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
i would not recommend getting one... I have been given one some 3 hundred and sixty 5 days and a 0.5 in the past (I wasn't felony and it grow to be extremely sketchy..) even though it does develop right into a black rectangle and maximum tattoo artists that i've got talked to afterwards would not even conisder doing a barcode, and suggested basically doing something over it something wood and so on. that should have the comparable varieties of strains to conceal it up. I do love the belief and if it have been to artwork i might do it 1000 instances over, and it does actual test...yet i do no longer think of it extremely is nicely worth it..
2016-12-14 15:36:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is terribly wrong, what is wrong with you? How about looking at your children and finding identifying marks on them that are there naturally, or better yet pay attention to your children so they don't get lost in the first place. Some people are just crazy
2006-07-28 09:20:30 · answer #3 · answered by Joy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I probably wouldn't tatoo them on the back of their necks - that's a very sensitive area that would probably hurt A LOT. If you are really wanting to be able to identify them, then it would probably be cheaper and less painful to get a child identification kit. They are available at some sheriff's offices and also online: yoursafechild.com, safetykids.com, thesafeside.com. In fact, many of them have DNA collection available. But I think it's rather extreme to tattoo your children for the sake of identification.
Good luck!!!
2006-07-28 09:21:44 · answer #4 · answered by headshrinker 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course it's wrong! How would you feel if you had to walk around with a barcode on the back of your neck for the rest of your life? There are many other simple ways to make sure your children don't get lost...by looking after them carefully...making them wear necklaces that make noises...wearing ID bands. Tatoo's are not the answer to your problem, especially my using them on children.
2006-07-28 09:20:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES.... it's wrong.
Tattoos are permanent.... and even if removed will leave a scar.
The only tattoos a child should have are the moles, freckles and marks that they were born with.
I know there are GPS collars for dogs http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/global-pet-finder-gps-for-dogs-158923.php .... but if your kids are getting that far from you, you've got a problem with supervision. And they are children, not dogs.
I know they are your kids.... but you don't have the right to permanently mark them. They should have that choice when they are old enough to make that decision for themselves.
If you are worried about them getting lost.... I suggest you watch them better. That's what conscientious parents do.
2006-07-28 09:25:18 · answer #6 · answered by Primrose 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You should not even think about it. God gives us children as a gift. He gave them to you without any imperfections and it is not your place to tattoo them. They may not want marked for life. If they want a stupid barcode on their necks, they can choose to do so when they are adults. I think that maybe the Dept. of Human Services need to come out and check on your children. Anyone with such a sick idea may do anything to their kids. I don't even think it is legal to tattoo children. Are you readu to go to jail for illegally tattooing a minor? And if you do tattoo them, I hope you do get to serve time for it.
2006-07-28 09:25:00 · answer #7 · answered by just guessing 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If your kids get lost, this will in no way make it easier to find them. It could, however make it easier to identify them if they were killed. I would implant one of those little chips instead, that way they can take it out when they are older, and no one can see it. But that is only if I was worried about losing my kids. I am not.
2006-07-28 09:20:24 · answer #8 · answered by 1,1,2,3,3,4, 5,5,6,6,6, 8,8,8,10 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If well if you are so worried about them getting lost how about getting a nanny and body guard. Tattoo are against the laws for people under21 anyway and if you are afraid of them getting lost at 21 then ytattoo them on the butt
2006-07-28 10:03:08 · answer #9 · answered by Santa's Personal Shopper 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes the hell it is wrong!! That ink is poison and it isn't made for childrens bodies to handle. I really don't think you love your kids enough because you are considering such a thing, I really will doubt you love them at all if you proceed with the idea. besides, what could you benifit from doing so.
2006-07-28 09:23:30 · answer #10 · answered by shidaboo 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean if they get lost while someones doing store inventory? Yeah OK maybe.
Otherwise, just put a siren hat on them with the lights and everything. Then they will never get lost.
2006-07-28 09:19:35 · answer #11 · answered by _Kraygh_ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋