The muslims are united and ready to fight.
2006-07-28 08:33:37 · 21 answers · asked by Olivia 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
YES BROTHER
JESUS is COMNIG!
HALELLUYAH!
2006-07-28 08:36:22 · answer #1 · answered by truuuuubelever 1 · 3⤊ 2⤋
One of my friends is convinced of this very thing. He thinks that because Israel is being invaded from the North this is a sure sign of the end of the world. (The bible says in the final years Israel will be attacked by enemies from the north). This is completely ridiculous. With only for cardinal directions to choose from, of course Israel will be attacked from the North at some point. That's like me saying the world will end when my set of dice land on snake eyes. If the bible makes broad enough predictions, one of them is bound to turn out to be true.
2006-07-28 08:38:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i ought to think if one rejoices at those verses relies upon upon even if one is kept or no longer. To a nonchristian, those verses look like jibberish and they could even discover contempt in them, at the same time as we, who're actual christians, will actually discover convenience in those verses. the unhappy area of all of that is, there are those human beings, like radical muslim terorrist, who imagine they're doing what's ideal with suggestions from God, at the same time as actually they're very missguided souls who choose to study what those verses recommend...and repent. The day is quickly coming, even if, at the same time as each and every knee shall bow....which will be a excellent day certainly !
2016-11-26 21:08:12 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right!
Sheesh! No Heaven, No Hell, No God or Devil All crap. You die, get thrown in the ground and turn to dust. Didn't any of you know that Jesus was a gay snake-oil salesman?
2006-07-28 08:42:24 · answer #4 · answered by Rocko Barbella 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one has the slightest physical evidence to support a historical Jesus; no artifacts, dwelling, works of carpentry, or self-written manuscripts. All claims about Jesus derive from writings of other people. There occurs no contemporary Roman record that shows Pontius Pilate executing a man named Jesus. Devastating to historians, there occurs not a single contemporary writing that mentions Jesus. All documents about Jesus got written well after the life of the alleged Jesus from either: unknown authors, people who had never met an earthly Jesus, or from fraudulent, mythical or allegorical writings. Although one can argue that many of these writings come from fraud or interpolations, I will use the information and dates to show that even if these sources did not come from interpolations, they could still not serve as reliable evidence for a historical Jesus, simply because all sources derive from hearsay accounts.
Hearsay means information derived from other people rather than on a witness' own knowledge.
Courts of law do not generally allow hearsay as testimony, and nor does honest modern scholarship. Hearsay provides no proof or good evidence, and therefore, we should dismiss it.
If you do not understand this, imagine yourself confronted with a charge for a crime which you know you did not commit. You feel confident that no one can prove guilt because you know that there exists no evidence whatsoever for the charge against you. Now imagine that you stand present in a court of law that allows hearsay as evidence. When the prosecution presents its case, everyone who takes the stand against you claims that you committed the crime, not as a witness themselves, but solely because other people said so. None of these other people, mind you, ever show up in court, nor can anyone find them.
Hearsay does not work as evidence because we have no way of knowing whether the person lies, or simply bases his or her information on wrongful belief or bias. We know from history about witchcraft trials and kangaroo courts that hearsay provides neither reliable nor fair statements of evidence. We know that mythology can arise out of no good information whatsoever. We live in a world where many people believe in demons, UFOs, ghosts, or monsters, and an innumerable number of fantasies believed as fact taken from nothing but belief and hearsay. It derives from these reasons why hearsay cannot serves as good evidence, and the same reasoning must go against the claims of a historical Jesus or any other historical person.
Authors of ancient history today, of course, can only write from indirect observation in a time far removed from their aim. But a valid historian's own writing gets cited with sources that trace to the subject themselves, or to eyewitnesses and artifacts. For example a historian today who writes about the life of George Washington, of course, can not serve as an eyewitness, but he can provide citations to documents which give personal or eyewitness accounts. None of the historians about Jesus give reliable sources to eyewitnesses, therefore all we have remains as hearsay.
2006-07-29 15:53:15 · answer #5 · answered by jmatt_inc 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who's the Anti-Christ?
2006-07-28 08:35:22 · answer #6 · answered by SAHM2_1B_1G 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the muslims gov. are not really united, and not really following Islam.
2006-07-28 08:38:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
...just keep on thinking that way until Israel turns the whole place into a parking lot .....
2006-07-28 08:37:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Im glad you think war is so funny asswipe
2006-07-28 08:40:33 · answer #9 · answered by sexydp 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
too bad you dont get 12 virgins
2006-07-28 08:35:49 · answer #10 · answered by Commander 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the anti-christ is george bush
2006-07-28 08:35:49 · answer #11 · answered by jack_daniels 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋