The liberals hate Bush because he is a man of principle who can not be swayed by faked public opinion polls. He has morals and he sticks to them.
It was liberals that invented "situational ethics." There is no such thing. Changing your ethics based on the situation means having no ethics!
I heard a liberal at work talking about "broad mental reservation." That's a nice, big phrase for a half-truth, like when Clinton said, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." Well, he didn't include bj's as "sexual relations," so he claims he wasn't lying. When you start using that kind of lawyer logic to lie without "technically" lying, you are not ethical.
2006-07-28 07:38:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by FozzieBear 7
·
1⤊
6⤋
Why are you labeling all Liberals Satanic? How many times do we have to have the conversation, that your local librarian can be a Satanist?
What Clinton did was wrong, however, he had to deal with that and deal with his wife.
If you look at all that President Bush has done for our country - give me a break... I don't have to tolerate or support Bush -- that is called FREEDOM OF CHOICE. Christians are NOT more tolerant of anything because if THEY were, they would NOT come on here saying the stuff they do to folks who do not follow the same path.
Get over it already.
2006-07-28 08:08:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Scarlett 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Wow, you are completely delusional.
You really believe that the christian right stood behind clinton? (Remember anything about impeachment, and the endless news coverage and screaming fundies about Americas morals?)
You really believe that the half-retarded war-mongering moron in office now is free from criticism, and that his slaughtering of 10s of thousands of innocents is justifiable?
You really believe that liberals (which i am not), want rampant crime and terrorism in America?
You obviously know nothing about the very poor job bush has actually done to implement any form of effective defense against terrorism at home. Airline and seaport security is a joke. The border security is as porous as ever, and the NSA, CIA, and FBI still couldn't find bin Laden even if he was having dinner at bush's ranch in Texas.
Ohh yeah, you do know that the bin Ladens family is good friends with the bush's don't you?
And how about how badly bush has destroyed america's image in the rest of the world. How many allies have become enemies? How many more terrorists exist now with the desire to destroy america because of bush's personal war?
And are you really stupid enough to believe that Iraq and Afghanistan are going well now?
You are pathetic.
2006-07-28 07:51:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Peole like you blew that scandal to hell and back. Don't lie.
Why are you grouping liberals and satanists. What brings them together?
And athiests can disrespect the fact that he's a god-fearing man, since that doesn't come into the equation.
Don't group everyone together. Some liberals tolerate him, so some strong minded christians can "tolerate" homosexuals. I see no need to tolerate terrorists and criminals, they chose to be that way.
2006-07-28 07:40:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bob Charlie 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Tolerated Clinton - the Christian right? Pullleeeeeeze!
2006-07-28 07:38:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Skeff 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ooh here we go again. Another angry conservatist.
look honey, We dont all hate George Bush. In my opinion I think he is a great human being, and would be an awesome person to hang out with.
However, He isnt a good president. He is doing an awful job. However, he truly believes he is doing a good job which is the problem. He isnt the sharpest tool in the shed.
Now would you stop being so angry? Get over it already, Geeze.
2006-07-28 07:39:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Hey girl 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
You seem to have forgotten the years while Clinton was in office. I have never seen so much name-calling and rock-throwing. Just read through the transcripts from Rush Limbaugh's radio program. And did your people really tolerate him? Seems to me your people impeached him. That's hardly what I would call tolerating him.
For what it's worth, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and Jimmy Carter all go to church. Go to amazon.com and type in "Jimmy Carter". Here's a couple of what you'll find:
"Our Endangered Values: America's Moral Crisis" by Jimmy Carter
"Living Faith" by Jimmy Carter
p.s. I don't recall Jesus telling us to go kill people (and that would include Iraqis).
2006-07-29 17:55:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by jeffcogs 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well, I am a Christian. I try to follow God's will for my life but I certainly do not like Bush! You're putting all Christians into one category, be careful, not all Christians back Bush! I certainly don't, never have and never will! And, it isn't because I'm not tolerant, it's because I don't believe He truly wants what is best for the American people, I believe he only wants what is best for him and his rich friends, like Cheney and many others. I don't believe he is doing what is right and I don't believe he is following God's will for His life. Now, that is only my opininon.
Amen! Bregweid and yes, Happy, I'd love a cupcake! Thanks!
2006-07-28 07:41:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by amomentssunlight 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Your boxes are all out of order, honey!!! Take off all your little labes and empty everything out and start again. Bush loves ALL Americans? Stop smoking whatever is in that pipe, OH you're a republican conservative.... stop breathing unrecycled air. I am a Christian and I do not agree with what you said. Your borders and boundaries are causing you to sound pretty ignorant, angry, sheltered and misinformed. And you're defending George W. Bush. Sad day. Sad day.
2006-07-28 07:39:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sleek 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
shall we harm this down: A. No, he's no longer a Christian, no longer even close B. No, he's no longer brave, he instruments from the convenience of his workplace and orders greater troops. B(a) You dont even comprehend what a communist is do you? C. Make me a factor of a political dynasty and that i visit pass to any college, have any degree, and make whaterver grades i like. C(a) Ever heard of a "liberal college professor"?, uh, yeah.. D. to declare that president Bush is a greater advantageous president than Clinton became is laughable, he's no longer much greater advantageous than his one term loser of a father. E. Haha, advantageous...
2016-10-01 04:50:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by marve 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Reported.
2006-07-30 13:16:58
·
answer #11
·
answered by 2 days after my B day :) 2
·
0⤊
0⤋