It's not an uncommon request to say younger people can't attend the reception - but it's rude to say you can come and dance but not eat!! And it's also something that should be put into the invitations so you know way in advance.
2006-07-28 07:21:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Molly 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I understand the concept of no kids at weddings, because meals can be very costly, but a 15 year old is not the same as a 2-10 year old. Although, I understand the concept I never agreed with it, when I got married and had the reception, I wanted to share it with all my family and friends, so we had a buffet and invited everyone.
My answer is yes it is very rude and if I were your brother I would not go, or send them a gift
2006-07-28 07:23:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the invitation stated no kids allowed, then it is not rude. If they sprung it on him after all the plans were made for him to attend, then yes it is. Most wedding parties don't want really young kids, like below 12 or 13. A 15 year old should be able to attend.
2006-07-28 07:20:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by harleychic 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I used the "No little ones" rule at my wedding ceremony. there became an added line on my RSVP taking part in cards that suggested: _____ seats have been reserved. till now we mailed out our invites, I filled interior the form... So on your sister, you're able to placed 2 extremely of 7 (assuming that she is married). This additionally got here in obtainable to maintain the concentrated visitor checklist down. We had some human beings mark out their form and upload an added guy or woman- yet for the main section, human beings have been given the hint. you additionally can hire a babysitter and deliver all little ones to a chosen room. interior the tip, it is your wedding ceremony & there heavily isn't a "do-over". I had to place definitely everyone else's emotions aside and do exactly what i wanted. i attempted to delight maximum of alternative people who i became getting under pressure out and doing each and every little thing different than what i wanted. what's substantial is which you're happy on your day. =)
2016-10-01 04:49:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by marve 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I always thought no kids allowed meant kids under 13 years old, not teenagers as they know how to behave.
It's not really rude. Just leave his son at home. I bet he'd have more fun at home than at some stuffy wedding.
2006-07-28 07:21:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Roz 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That seems way harsh to tell a 15 year old that he cannot eat at his own cousins reception dinner! So what is he going to eat Mc Donald's?
2006-07-28 07:20:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by doverton26 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i hate that! i went to a wedding like that before, i felt bad for the groom's sister she couldnt find a baby sitter and she had 3 kids, and she ended up not going becuz of the "new wifes" rule, becuz she dosent want lil kids ruining the wedding or making alot of noise and nonsense. i thought it was completly rude and inconsiderate. i hope your cousin relizes what he or she is doing and should change their mind becuz family is family, and they should all be there for the big event
2006-07-28 07:23:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
uh, YA, sounds totally rude. Are they concerned with money? How can he be invited to only part of it? I would re think going all together, where would the 15 year old go? c-r-a-z-y!
2006-07-28 07:21:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by dogriver 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very rude. I think this is awful. Family shouldn't be treated this way.
2006-07-28 07:22:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by baby girl 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
why are kids not allowed??? i would think that is very rude. if someone did that in my family, all the aunties and uncles would get really mad.
2006-07-28 07:20:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by taytay 4
·
0⤊
0⤋