Was it love or lust?
2006-07-28 06:58:06 · 9 answers · asked by norabb_14 2 in Education & Reference ➔ Other - Education
I think that Romeo and Juliet are not supposed to be "real" characters, but concepts. The entire story makes us idealize love AND lust and makes us examine unanswerable questions like Do you believe in love at first sight? and Would you die for Love? You can interpret Shakespeare a million different ways. Have fun with that - good question!
2006-07-28 07:03:16 · answer #1 · answered by Fortune Favors the Brave 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The play by using Shakespeare tells us that they've been so in like it made them no longer able to stay without the different. while Juliet is assumed ineffective, Romeo kills himself for grief. Juliet does an identical while she learns of Romeo's passing. Is that true love? in step with probability, even though it is only a tale...
2016-12-10 17:19:31 · answer #2 · answered by herzog 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
love and only love if it was lust then it wud have be famous as lust but it depicts love
2006-07-28 07:02:15 · answer #3 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
love
2006-07-28 07:02:03 · answer #4 · answered by oana 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was lust
2006-07-28 07:01:13 · answer #5 · answered by Kaiser Abhishek 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How about neither? Maybe it was obsession.
2006-07-28 07:02:07 · answer #6 · answered by contra_z 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, why else would they die for each other?
2006-07-28 07:01:03 · answer #7 · answered by jeanette 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO!! They was just horny!!! From the real Nutcase!!! PS...did i wn...did i wn...did i wn???
2006-07-28 07:33:49 · answer #8 · answered by dl200558 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Duh. It was love. Tell your teacher he/she is making it too easy! LOL
2006-07-28 07:01:30 · answer #9 · answered by Ambervisions 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋