What other mammals?
2006-07-27 22:17:12 · 10 answers · asked by Biomimetik 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Evolution has been disproved, and I'm not just saying that because I'm a Christian, it's scientific fact. Don't believe me? Go here: http://designeduniverse.com/articles/Evidence_Disproving_Evolution/evidence_disproving_evolution.html
2006-07-27 22:21:16 · answer #1 · answered by k 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Keep in mind, humans evolved alongside monkeys, not from them.
To answer your question though, primitive monkeys. You can follow this trail all the way back to the primordial soup. Evolution began as single celled organisms began adapting to the needs of what and where they were.
And to the individual that said it was a disproved theory...did you read the news about the galapagos finches within the last 2 weeks? They proved an evolutionary change witnessed within the last century.
2006-07-28 05:40:29 · answer #2 · answered by Bill K Atheist Goodfella 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wow that one link on y evolution is wrong was really pathetic.don tbelieve it, that girl needs to do real research.i think monkeys and all other mammals evolved from a small mouse like mammal in prehistoric times.and that mammal evolved from a tiny cell. lol i cant explain the whole thing cuz i dont have time but it was sumthin like that.
2006-07-28 05:30:04 · answer #3 · answered by chevyman502 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Adam and Eve? Nah, just kidding. Good Question ,but I got no answer for that.
Above website is b*** . Ever looked at embryos from different species? The horse was at one time as small as a fox with toes, it evolved into what we know as a horse now.
2006-07-28 05:22:11 · answer #4 · answered by sabina-2004@sbcglobal.net 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From Eutherians.. Animals with placentas
Other animals derived from this Classification are:
1. Edentata ; armadillos, ant eaters
2. Pholidota; Pangolins
3. Lagomorpha; rabbits, hares
4. Rodentia; mice, rats, beavers
5. Primates; monkeys etc.
6. etc. etc.
2006-07-28 05:27:08 · answer #5 · answered by Roffi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
some tree dwelling mammal of sorts. hell, they might not have even lived in trees.
and kaleigh im sorry but it hasnt been disproven. the fact is that 99% of the scientific population (and yes that excludes creation scientists as they are NOT scientists) agrees and supports the theory of evolution.
sorry kid. just cause a website says its been "disproven" doesent mean it has.
2006-07-28 05:21:57 · answer #6 · answered by johnny_zondo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From other monkeys.
2006-07-28 09:31:24 · answer #7 · answered by P P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Something very similar to you
2006-07-28 05:25:52 · answer #8 · answered by ElderStud 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the gene
2006-07-28 05:20:40 · answer #9 · answered by isiddhayoga 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hey kaileigh please shut up already. Creationist scientists are not real scientists.
2006-07-28 05:37:27 · answer #10 · answered by zatte 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋