Years ago DC Comics released a short lived super hero Batwoman who was straight. Now they have re-released the character and made her a lesbian. Do you think there actions were appropriate seeing that comic books are predominantly marketed towards children? Do you think their actions were a genuine attempt to help the gay community or simply exploit them for profit? What do you think their motives were? Personally, Batwoman straight or gay just doesn't do it for me and I see it bombing regardless.
2006-07-27 18:23:06 · 13 answers · asked by cave man 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Hi!
That is nonesense!!!
How can they do that? And surely our children will want to watch it...
I don't know how else to tell the world this:
"WE ARE APPROACHING THE EVIL DAYS WHERE SATAN IS INFILTRATING EVERY SYSTEM OF THE WORLD"
Let's wake up to realise that Satan is real and so is Jesus Christ!
Satan is happy when people think he is a myth! He knows that he will destroy the last drop of morality in this world....
Some people all over the world are happy that Europe has become so godless....Who said that?Well, they have not really become godless, they have replaced the true God with the OCCULT and it is going to destroy their lives...Yes, that is what Satan wanted when he encouraged Europe to stop PRAYERS in schools...He introduced the idea as if it was fair decision for every religion but actually it was for his own agenda.
Thank you for mentioning this on Y!Answers!
Hug!
2006-07-27 18:50:34 · answer #1 · answered by Hope Dollar 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Today comic books are actually marketed to the 20's -30's and not children. The story lines and artwork for many years have had more of an adult feel and children are usually more interesting in PlayStation and xbox to worry about who or what is in a comic book.
I think it is fine that they made Batwoman a lesbian. I don't think it's exploitation rather than a showing that a certain percent of the population is homosexual and that is all.
What will make the comic a success or failure will be the story lines and adventures given not the fact the main character is gay.
2006-07-27 19:55:43 · answer #2 · answered by genaddt 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isn't Bat-woman, Bat-girl grown up? It is not short lived in fact she was on the show. She was the commissioners daughter if I remember. Anyway, I don't think that there is anything wrong with her being a lesbian. It is about time that the comics in the US started to address real issues. It is time we stopped being afraid to let our kids know that there are different people out there, and it is okay to be them or yourself. When people say things like this it goes to show why we are not as free as we think, cause others are always trying to discourage us.
2006-07-27 18:30:31 · answer #3 · answered by Artistic Prof. 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Truly sad how we are going back to a spiritual state in the likeness of Sodom and Gomorrha.
The next generation does not have a chance at understanding what is right or even coming close to believing it.
So sad it really is...
It is very unacceptable. That is Gods perspective.
2006-07-27 18:33:05 · answer #4 · answered by Carc CowBoy 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sad, very sad. Now they're subjecting even younger children to a sinful way of life by making it appear to be normal. And using a super hero to look up to as a role model.
2006-07-27 18:27:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think that it's a sign of the times where people are more interested in money than in morality.
2006-07-27 18:33:43 · answer #6 · answered by Martin S 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Just another gimmick to sell more books. Sigh.
2006-07-27 18:29:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Its awfull.
I love gays as much as any human being,but i am agianst being gay,it is a sin.
2006-07-27 18:29:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I do not like it but with everyone wanting to be PC what did you expect.
2006-07-27 18:26:30 · answer #9 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What does that have to do with religion or spirituality?
2006-07-27 18:29:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋