English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

I can't believe all this over a magazine cover of a woman breastfeeding. It is a natural thing. If you dont like the cover all I can say is dont look at it. There is a big difference between a baby breastfeeding and porn.

2006-07-27 23:07:21 · answer #1 · answered by JAYNE C 4 · 2 0

Guess what? Before bottles were invented, babies were fed from (gasp!) their mother's breasts!!

How on earth can showing a picture of a baby being breast fed be equalled to pornography, which is demeaning to both men and women? Breast feeding is just as offensive as anything else that's natural. You might as well get upset over orange juice, or bananas (which is often compared to a male part of the anatomy). Breast feeding is no more a sexual act than eating food or going to sleep.

Please step out of the dark ages already.

2006-07-28 00:43:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Looks like both to me.

A.A. Fussy
Babya Software Group

2006-07-28 00:41:28 · answer #3 · answered by babyap2002 2 · 0 0

I dont think it was nessasary. I would hate to be that kid in 10 years!
They could have put on a dif picture, that wasnt needed, all women know what breastfeeing is and looks like.

2006-07-28 01:24:41 · answer #4 · answered by Sheena H 1 · 0 1

Where is this world going? Breastfeeding equaled with pornography and perversion??!!!
I can't believe this.

2006-07-28 04:21:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers