English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

30 answers

west Virgina. a coal mine . its always 68 degrees and the water that drips through the coal is filtered like in a fish tank.and food well stock up or learn how to digest bark from trees.

2006-07-27 14:17:56 · answer #1 · answered by 19cm-u-know 3 · 1 0

The best place to be is somewhere else. You don't need to be on another planet, but you should try to be outside the blast zone. You might build a shelter and survive the blast even closer to the explosion.

Radiation gets less intense over time and generally follows the 7-10 rule (for every 7-fold increase in time the radiation is reduced to 1/10 what it was before). Assuming one nearby explosion and 1000 rems at 1 hour after the explosion, the radiation should be at 100 rems at 7 hours, 10 rems at 49 hours, and 1 rem per hour at about two weeks.

Read the links below for information on surviving a nuclear war. The first link is How to Survive Doomsday (myth-busting). The second link is 11 steps to nuclear war survival (canadian pamphlet). The third is a quick guide to surviving nuclear war, use it as a checklist (print it out for just-in-case). The fourth link is about blast and fallout shelters. The last link is an online version of Nuclear War Survival Skills, a book written by Cresson H. Kearny, a former engineer at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (a nuclear weapons fabrication site). This book is considered the best work on the subject.

The links are all from the same site, but most of the info is from government sources. The site is a treasure trove of information. If you want to learn more about nuclear weapons design, then visit http://www.nuclearweaponarchive.org

2006-07-27 14:52:06 · answer #2 · answered by Wyld Stallyns 4 · 0 0

The safest place: Mountains of Alaska

The best places:
1 ) On the front lines.
2) At home with your family.

2006-07-27 14:30:18 · answer #3 · answered by Thomas the Tank 2 · 0 0

regrettably, WWIII will be global suicide, hence in answer on your question, see you later as there is rational superpowers who count number on MAD, there'll be no WW3. by definition, the subsequent international conflict wil be nuclear, how ought to it no longer. In a nuclear conflict there'll be no winner. In a nuclear international, the purely genuine enemy is conflict itself. the subsequent international conflict will contain a nuclear replace, how ought to it no longer if both area trust no value for victory will be too severe. contained in the first 0.5-hour, almost a thousand million human beings can were vaporised, frequently contained in the U. S., Russia, Europe, China and Japan. yet another a million.5 billion will die presently thereafter from radiation poisoning. The northern hemisphere will be plunged into prolonged affliction and barbarity. ultimately the nuclear iciness will unfold to the southern hemisphere and all plant existence will die. You ask the position is the proper position to be, you're asking even as can we commit global suicide. My answer is it gained't take position quickly because the better superpowers are extra rational than the rump states contained in the middle east. even as we hear communicate of a nuclear-Iran or a conflict of words with NorKor, little is declared about both bulls contained in the glass keep. The arsenals of Russia and the U. S. are sufficient to wreck a million Hiroshimas. yet there are fewer than 3000 cities on earth with populations of 100,000 or extra. you won't be able to locate something like a million Hiroshimas to obliterate. excellent military and business objectives that are faraway from cities are truly uncommon. Our greatest possibility is from an unintended launch by the Russians. on the point of global suicide, it would not remember who's on what area....the position you pass to hide, or how lengthy you could live on. In a nuclear age like i discussed beforehand, the purely genuine enemy is conflict itself.

2016-10-15 07:02:12 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Under the White House

2006-07-27 14:15:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In the nuclear missile silo or underground with the missile combat crew.

Both are designed to take a direct hit by a nuclear weapon.

2006-07-27 14:16:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Space

2006-07-27 14:16:27 · answer #7 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1 0

In an all-out, worldwide nuclear war, there are no safe places.

2006-07-27 15:18:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Upwind or at least 50 miles away, depending on the weapon employed and it's height of burst. I'm really glad I don't live near Washington, D.C. or in New Jersey. Of course, I'm glad I don't live in NJ for a bunch of other reasons!

2006-07-27 14:18:49 · answer #9 · answered by rb42redsuns 6 · 0 0

On the plane that drops the bomb. Or on the space station. Anywhere but here. If the blast doesn't get you the radiation will. But don't worry. You're safe until you start noticing your hair falling out, your teeth falling out, your skin peeling off, your dick not working anymore, etc. etc. etc.

2006-07-27 14:18:27 · answer #10 · answered by Tom 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers