Group A thinks that Group B bases all of its morals and ideas on a book of fairytales and the word of a non-existing being.
Group B thinks that same book and Being are the absolute truth, and anybody who disagrees can have no morals.
Not all members of both groups are such extremists, but wouldn't it be much better is the both extremists parts of either group just started to ignore eachother? They will never agree in the end anyway.
2006-07-27 13:05:50 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Actually Jesus said much the same thing when he told His followers to be in this world but not part of this world, or words to that effect. Separate but equal I guess. Wasn't that Apartheid? I probably misspelled it, probably misspelled misspell too. Oh well, you probably get what I mean. People who are on opposite sides of the fence should worry about their own grass rather than trying to tell the neighbor how to mow his. Jesus wanted His Disciples to go about the routine of living but avoid the sins offered by the rest of humanity. But not just sins perse but also cares that really were not germaine to the Christian Way of Life. It was those who came later and politicized the Church that caused so much harm. You'll notice Jesus never said anything bad about the common people. He was a peacemaker, the Prince of Peace. Isn't it astonishing that those who preached peace and did good works, like Ghandi, Martin Luther King Jr., Bobby Kennedy and on and on are the ones who were slaughtered? And people like Bush live forever! Uh Oh, shouldn't have said that. My computer might disappear.
2006-07-27 13:24:46 · answer #1 · answered by Tom 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well the bad thing about group B is that the same book is set up to look down on group A. That same book teaches that all are pretty much nothing unless they believe in the book. Group A is taught a form of hate, in the guise of love. It's really kind of sad if you think about it. One group is taught to see the light and they do not, the other See's the light and are told by those that don't see the light that they are not seeing the light. It's actually a living nightmare the whole thing.
2006-07-27 13:13:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be better if both groups accepted the fact that the other group has the right to believe or not believe in anything they want.
BUT, IT'LL NEVER HAPPEN, why, because God tells christians to spread the word. So we have to keep on bugging people making nuisences out of ourselves making everybody get where they can't stand us. And Christians absolutly can't stand it when people say what we believe is a fairy tail or a non-existing God. And non believers won't stop christian bashing calling our creator, our Heavenly Father a non-existing being, and saying our Bible is a book of fairytales.
We are never gonna agree, you're right, we aren't meant to.
2006-07-27 13:23:30 · answer #3 · answered by creeklops 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You could say that. But on the hand of someone who believes that the Book is absolute Truth, perhaps the best thing to do is try to spread the Word to as many people as possible.
2006-07-27 13:53:31 · answer #4 · answered by tertiahibernica 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you kinda answered your own question. extremists have to be heard, otherwise they wouldnt be what they are. intelligent people will wait till they are asked, idiots will answer before they are. i dont see it ever being anyother way. its about being judgemental, which might have some merit if the person was 100% right. you wont find that in either group.
2006-07-27 13:27:19 · answer #5 · answered by chris l 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
properly previously I study this me and my chum were speaking about the consequences of dmt,she confirmed me something she wrote at the same time as on it and it develop into incredible a lifeless ringer for this. so incredible, it really is absolutley genius Ive study it about 4 time, those those that arent examining dont recognize what theyre lacking with suggestions from being lazy. and now I ask a choose of you:ought to you message me your digital mail because we may like to communicate with you somewhat better. it ought to represent a ton. thanks!
2016-11-26 19:48:19 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow you should be head of United Nations or something. You just made all conflict go away in 3 minutes.
2006-07-27 13:08:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Then there won't be any fun. Human beings are not born to agree. I think it is fun to bash both groups.
2006-07-27 13:09:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Throw the book out and everything will be better.
2006-07-27 13:09:43 · answer #9 · answered by xcr0ss_my_heartx 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as there are people, there will be different beliefs and different ways to see things.
2006-07-27 13:09:21 · answer #10 · answered by trainer53 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋