i would say both..lve for hate..because they will never see the optimisitic part of their companion..and hate of love because they will never be able to experience the magic of true love...u always have to be optimistic when it comes to love..no matter how crappy it may seem..:)
2006-07-27 12:14:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
a love for hate
2006-07-27 19:16:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jas[mini-me] 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
a love for hate
2006-07-27 19:13:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by so-lost 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
a love for hate
2006-07-27 19:12:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by whoa 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
a love for hate
2006-07-27 19:12:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Green-eyed-pilot 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd think a love for hate...someone whose desire was to hate things is to me much more sad (or scary perhaps) than someone who hates love...the love hater has loved and been hurt, and thus is simply afraid to love again...
2006-07-27 19:13:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by . 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
A hate for love ..cus you are closing yourself off from ever being loved by anyone and if you close that from yourself then there is really no point of living .
2006-07-27 19:13:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Arent they the same.....I mean if you hate love, you must enjoy or "love" hating things so theyre pretty much the same right?
2006-07-27 19:13:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A love for hate I believe but neither is good nor healthy for one's soul!!
2006-07-27 19:13:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jimmy Pete 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
they both suck if u love hate u never make friends but if u hate love u'll never find someone it's a sticky situation
2006-07-27 19:13:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Corona_14 3
·
0⤊
0⤋