If that's the case, then the expected would be unexpected, and since the unexpected is expected, which is subsequently unexpected, we're right back where we started. :-)
2006-07-27 11:04:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ѕємι~Мαđ ŠçїєŋŧιѕТ 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, but expecting the unexpected doesn't make the unexpected really expected.
It's kind of like expecting a car to come, but you don't know what kind of car it is... you still know a car is coming, but you still don't know what car it is... therefor it's expected, yet unexpected as well.
2006-07-27 18:03:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mimblewimble 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, because the unexpected comes in so many unexpected ways that you can never expect it.
2006-07-27 18:05:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by musicisme 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would loop, because then the expected is the unexpected. So, you may as well expect thge expected.
2006-07-27 18:13:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by krackocloud 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. It just makes it less of a sucker punch.
2006-07-27 18:14:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Haveitlookedat 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
u guys r really confusing
2006-07-27 18:06:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by mandy w 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Uh. . .yeah?
2006-07-27 18:04:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mimi 5
·
0⤊
0⤋