English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Almost without fail when someone wants to say Hitler wasn't Christian they revert to a second-hand source (table-talk) that allegedly records the words of Hitler. The table-talk got edited by the anti-Catholic Martin Bormann (Hitler's secretary) and describes political views against the hierarchy of orthodox Christianity (just as Bormann would have liked) but even here, Hitler never speaks against Jesus Christ, but rather in favor of him.

What truly obliterates this theory (that he was only pretending) comes from the fact that Hitler continued to express his "positive" Christian views, well after his rise to power. If, indeed, he needed Christianity only for political purposes, then why-oh-why does he continue with the charade after he has established himself as absolute dictator?

To say Hitler used Christianity only for political forces has absolutely no historical basis to back it up.

2006-07-27 08:53:52 · 21 answers · asked by Quantrill 7 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

If Hitler followed Nietzschian philosophy or even admired him, then where does he describe him or his philosophy?

Nowhere in Mein Kampf does Hitler even mention Nietzsche, or Nietzchian terms such as superman, or super race. Of course Hitler did think the Aryan's represented a superior race to the Jews, but never in Nietzchian terms.

2006-07-27 09:02:56 · update #1

21 answers

Hitler was a christian and a devout one at that. The Nazi party was founded on christian doctrine and ideals.
These are historical facts and cannot be disputed.

http://www.nobeliefs.com/nazis.htm

Proof that cannot be denied or disputed. But they'll try.
And I for one laugh when they do it. Because these are the same people who claim that Einstein was a christian and that Darwin recanted on his death-bed.
*shakes head*

Edit- Student, how ironic that your post just happens to be above mine.
Now, follow the link and try to act like a REAL student and learn the truth for once. Ok?

2006-07-27 09:01:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Hitler believed he was the messiah and that his third reich would last 1000 years. The Nazis proudly claimed as much - code word meaning that he and his Nazi's were really the second coming of Christ.

This is anti-christ. Certainly anti Christian.

Hitler's crimes against humanity served to automatically excommunicate him from the church.

Hitler was also the master of the big lie.

Most of his lies served to sway world opinion in his favor. Others were to cover up what he was doing or what he planned to do next.

Hitler intended to became the absolute dictator of the whole world. His lies helped him to take over Germany and most of Europe. He enjoyed charades. It was just part of the game for him.

You must be reading a different version of world history than I am.

2006-07-27 09:10:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Or you could just go straight to the fascist asshead horse's mouth:

"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God’s truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow my self to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice… And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows . For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people." –Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)

2006-07-27 08:58:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hitler and his cohorts were evolutionists. They did not believe in the Bible account of creation, the Biblical world-view, nor did they believe in Jesus teachings. Nothing they did was in the name of Jesus, but rather in the name of evolution. Hitler was just another example of what happens when atheists get unchecked control and are free to fulfill the atheist belief in evolution and
no higher power to account to.

Hitler had a list of what he thought was the evolutionary development of the races, and he believed that the 'Arien' race was the most evolved.

According to evolution, the strong devours the weak. Hitler was just trying to remove the weak races so they would not hold back the evolution process or delay it. It was his right and duty to do so, and he did a great thing for the proponents of evolution and atheism.

2006-07-27 09:12:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ephesians 5:8 For ye were sometimes darkness, but now are ye light in the Lord: walk as children of light:
Why did Hitler walk in darkness then??? He obliterated the Jews...Jesus is Jewish...so why did Hitler speak against and murder the Jews???

Proverbs 8:7 For my mouth shall speak truth; and wickedness is an abomination to my lips.

2006-07-27 08:59:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Even on belt buckles of the German troops it said "God with us". Christendom has become so twisted over time that very few practice the form of Christianity that the apostles taught. Hitler was one of those. His actions, however, show that he was not Christ-like in his behavior and thus would not have been approved by God. The Bible tells that a rotten tree produces rotten fruitage, and you can tell the person by the fruitage. What does Hitler's fruitage show?

2006-07-27 08:57:43 · answer #6 · answered by CulturalWiz 3 · 0 0

In the long run, Hitler may have been stupid, but he was no fool. Every power seeker in history used the beliefs of those he sought to control as does Osama Bin Laden today.

No self proclaimed German messiah would have attempted to control Gemany by proclaiming himself a Moslem, a Jew, or a Hindu. But, of the thousands of pictures of him, how many show him in church?

The reality is that he honored the old Aryan Gods, using their symbols (the swastica, for one), their rituals (SS and Hitler Youth intitiations) and their likenesses in celebratory parades. And, if you research it, you will find Hitler Youth songs, written in his Honor and performed in his presence, that said, "Jesus step aside, we follow the Fuehrer".

2006-07-27 09:19:39 · answer #7 · answered by ALLEN F 3 · 0 0

Does the fact that Hitler was rounding up and killing Catholics by the end of the war hold any meaning to you. No christian would exterminate whole religions. Hitler was no Christian.

2006-07-27 09:04:36 · answer #8 · answered by judy_r8 6 · 0 0

Hitler was an atheist and followed the principle of Fredrick Niche who taught that there was no God and that humanity belonged to the "supermen" of the future. He readily adopted this theory and we all know the rest of the story.

Get your facts straight

2006-07-27 09:01:02 · answer #9 · answered by zero 3 · 0 0

"the final concepts on which the fathers finished independence were the final concepts of Christianity" -John Adams In a letter to Thomas Jefferson dated June 28, 1813 we are a Christian us of a contained in the experience that our moral code is depending on the Christian Bible. It does no longer propose we are solely Christian or might want to be a Christian with a view to be American. the reason they reported that Congress shall make No regulation respecting an institution of religion, or prohibiting the free workout of religion is what they understood the reason of founding this us of a. That reason replaced into to allow human beings to be free to coach their faith as they chosen. besides the undeniable fact that the theory of our Liberty is that all and sundry men count number on God. even as they used the time period "author" it replaced into universally understood that God is the author of each and every thing. It replaced into their rivalry that our rights come from God. What made u . s . large is that we carry that the skill to regulate comes from God and is going on to man or woman voters rather of a few Monarch as replaced into the case elsewhere contained in the international. you would possibly want to save their theory contained in the context of their body of reference. Adams also reported: "we haven't any authorities armed with skill able to contending with human passions unbridled by morality and faith. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry ought to damage the most well known cords of our structure as a whale is going by a internet. Our structure replaced into made only for an ethical and non secular human beings. that is thoroughly inadequate to the authorities of the different." Our Founders held that it replaced into no longer conceivable to have the point of non-public freedom they were describing except the persons had a good, morally absolute code by which they stay. *

2016-10-15 06:48:06 · answer #10 · answered by pantle 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers