English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

also both parties are insured on the car.

2006-07-27 08:22:13 · 6 answers · asked by Candace P 1 in Business & Finance Credit

6 answers

no as long as you have insurance

2006-07-27 16:01:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No, of course not! The lender cannot restrict who you allow to operate your vehicle. Any such contract clause would most likely be declared void both under common law and as contrary to public policy if it ever went to court.

You may allow any licensed driver to drive the car. Persons resident in your househould should be listed on the insurance policy as authorized operators.

Anyone who is NOT resident in your household may legally operate it even though they are not on the insurance policy, so long as they have your permission (or have reason to believe that they would have your permission, such as if you gave them a key) and they have a valid driver's license.

2006-07-27 15:34:00 · answer #2 · answered by Bostonian In MO 7 · 0 0

You are purchasing the car, if I read correctly and one name is one the loan but not the other. As long as both are insured there is no problem with either driving the vehicle.

2006-07-27 15:27:20 · answer #3 · answered by ladyangelovely 4 · 0 0

No. As long as someone isn't specifically excluded from the insurance policy, it's perfectly legal for anyone (with permission) to drive your car. Even if it's not fully paid for - or a lease.

2006-07-27 15:26:30 · answer #4 · answered by poohba 5 · 0 0

As long is the driver is on the insurance policy it doesn't matter

2006-07-27 15:27:02 · answer #5 · answered by It'sMe23 5 · 0 0

Call your insurance company. I think its ok if you have statefarm...but call your providor.

2006-07-27 15:25:55 · answer #6 · answered by bricabrac 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers