to start a war don't you think it is a little more serious then a extra marital affair in which clinton was brought up on the chopping block for isn't that a private matter between husband and wife?
2006-07-27 06:49:47 · 11 answers · asked by PAULINA S 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
Suze O: "Lying about a b l o w job is worse than lying about reasons to go to war"?????? Are you kidding? A bj never killed anybody! By the way, Clinton was impeached for lying to Congress (apparently that bunch of 535 liars don't like being lied to).
Bush lied to the American people because he had a personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein and wanted to 'finish' what his daddy started during Desert Storm (oh, yeah...Cheney also wanted all of Iraq's OIL).
So, Bush fabricated lies about weapons of mass destruction, lied to Congress about it, then squandered billions of dollars of taxpayers' money to fund his senseless, obscene 'war'. In the course of less than four years, Bush has been responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqi citizens for no justifiable reason (not to mention more than 2,500 U.S. soldiers whom he put in harm's way all to satisfy his own selfish ego).
Yes, PaulinaS, I agree that starting a war is a little more serious than an extra-marital affair. Especially when the 'war' was an illegal and unconstitutional invasion of another sovereign country that in no way threatened, provoked or attacked the United States.
Bush deserves more than impeachment: he should be tried for crimes against humanity in an international tribunal - and, if convicted, he and his evil cronies deserve to face a public firing squad.
___________________________________________________
Check out the new blog: BUSHWACKER!
www.blogger.com
http://al-aback.blogspot.com
___________________________________________________
The Bush administration, in collusion with the most evil, corrupt, cowardly, incompetent U.S. Congress in history, has tarnished America's reputation as a world leader and global peacekeeper - all for the sake of making a handful of American businessmen unimaginably rich.
Surely Satan has reserved a special oil-soaked corner of Hell for Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and their demonic associates where they can spend their eternal damnation blaming each other for making such a mess of our world. -RKO-
2006-07-27 07:21:43 · answer #1 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
do your research, if your referring to WMD's, they were found. also, gorge bush did not come up with the evidence. the CIA and other US Intel sources provided the evidence. Congress approved, bill Clinton approved, john Kerry, Howard dean, and john Edwards all approved prior to the invasion. he also didn't start the war, all he did was lead us on an offensive to keep the war over there away from us. not only terrorists, but the country's that stand by idol as terrorists run their government are all enemies in this war. if anything, bush deserves a kick in the pants for being a wuss and not continuing to push on Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia. the radical Islamics need to be wiped off the face of the earth. no war has been won, no enemy vanquished fighting minimalist war. Vietnam, Korean, SomALia, al-quida. all failures because the government is too concerned what everyone else thinks and not enough about what makes us safe.
2006-07-27 14:03:53 · answer #2 · answered by vituperative facetious wiseass 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well you are obviously uninformed and have no want to be informed so this will be easy. No, I don't think the president should be brought up on any charges at all. Clinton was impeached.......it wasn't just a little affair. Do your research. The truth is out there.
2006-07-27 14:17:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush should not be disciplined for Iraq,he did what he thought was right against terrorists,but what Bush should be held accountable is his lack of security toward our borders,while our soldiers are dying in foreign soil,illegals,drug traffickers,terrorists and anyone that cares to come here is crossing with very little resistance,all because he does not want to upset any ethnic group,George W Bush and most of the senate should be replaced with representatives that look after US citizens first, instead of their own political careers
2006-07-27 14:37:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't like Bush either. But, before I read your bio I thought you were about 11 years old. Lying about a b l o w job is worse than
lying about reasons to go to war. We've been down this road a few times before.
2006-07-27 13:58:21 · answer #5 · answered by Suze O 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he should be impeached. That was pretty serious, and I think using false evidence to get us into a war that has no 'right' or 'wrong' is even worse.
2006-07-27 13:54:19 · answer #6 · answered by epitome of innocence 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And Clinton used Kosovo to get out of that one. So I guess we are even
2006-07-27 13:53:51 · answer #7 · answered by James_Stormwind 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because he DID NOT produce false evidence. He did not start this war.
2006-07-27 14:44:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Heh, yup. Clinton's was personal, Dubya's is affecting the whole world.
2006-07-27 13:54:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
bush should be sent to a world court for crimes against humanity. he is the face of evil in the new century.
2006-07-27 13:53:25 · answer #10 · answered by Nunya B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋