2006-07-27 06:44:24 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
So who's more dangerous? The born-again Bush or the Islamic Bin Laden?
2006-07-27 06:45:03 · update #1
Of course Bush.Even Americans started to hate him.He was busy bombing Iraq while a part of his Country got ruined. A lot died.Bin laden is most likely dead but Bush is not.You know personally i don't think Bin Laden is Bad Or Good.I mean nobody is perfect and know body knows if he actually bombed the Towers. The Media and Bush probably just guessed.
2006-07-27 06:58:20 · answer #1 · answered by 2006cute 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tough question and one you will get lots of extreme answers on. i am tempted to say Bush, but Bush despite his power is limited by two thing : 1) he's not very popular . many within his own party are trying to distance themselves from him. 2) His term is almost up. Bin laden on the other hand is very popular in the islamic world. Even among moderates. many would gladly give their lives for him. Even in death he will still be a hero to many. Bush, like all presidents will fade fro mthe public eye when he is gone. i think this makes Bin laden much more danegrous theoretically.
2006-07-27 06:51:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush has caused a lot more deaths. Bin Laden is probably on his ranch in texas having a hamburger right now.
2006-07-27 06:48:33 · answer #3 · answered by bregweidd 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush forces and sends his own people to death, at least Bin Laden sends those crazy suicide men that want to die for his reason, so Bush is way way worse.
2006-07-27 06:52:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush, by far. at least his administration is: war in Iraq, Afghanistan, they completely ****** up Katrina and are responsible for 9/11. bin Laden is most likely dead.
2006-07-27 06:48:17 · answer #5 · answered by Justin Prime 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is as a lot a terrorist/mass assassin as FDR replaced into for responding to eastern aggression or perhaps (gasp) Nazi Germany even as the U. S. wasn't even attacked without delay by them. How, delusional do you would possibly want to be to trust that Bush must be seen a mass assassin? On excellent of that, a million million human beings? On excellent of that, wondering the Midwest stands in the back of you (the Left coast, i ought to understand)? Who needs to imagine for themselves right here?
2016-10-15 06:41:52 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bin laden
2006-07-27 08:30:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush, Bush
2006-07-27 06:48:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bin Laden. wouldn't you be more afraid of a man with no conscious?
2006-07-27 06:48:05 · answer #9 · answered by alli 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
both are responsible for the death of their own and others.
2006-07-27 06:48:34 · answer #10 · answered by andy17mex 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋