English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

You seem to be God of Ignorance....that sorted out "God" lets get some brains between those ears - the history of Pakistan has been built on ambitions of a single man - Md..Jinnah who believed that he would not become the PM of independednt India so long Jawahar lal Nehru had the backing on the congress what followed was a stupid division of boundaries between india and Pakistan. Gandhi and the gang should have put their foot down on Jinnah's two nation theory but then that is history. Later Kashmir was attacked by Pak army in 1948 in the hope that they would capture Kashmir and make it part of Pakistan, the king of Kashmir, Raja Hari Singh formally became part of Independent India with Kashmir getting special priviledges, the Indian army walked in Kashmir and pushed backed the Pak army. This is the history of Kashmir becoming part of India - now the reality - since 1950's Pakistan has not been able to come to terms with this lose. The result is it has fought two official and one non official war with India and lost every time.

Since they realise that cannot in anyway annex any Indian territory in open conflict their Inter Services Inteligence has resorted to promoting terrorist outfits to do it's dirty work. There are 14 know terrorist camps in POK plus there are hords of hardcore criminals like Dawood Ibrahim, Let Chief and the hijackers of IC814 being sheltered by Pakistan. India has ample proof that now ISI is promoting banned outfits like SIMI, ULFA and Naxal movements in India to disrupt a peaceful nation.

Proof has been given to Pakistan not once or twice but on several occassion at different levels right upto the level of Mr.Musharaf but then we all know how much has Pakistan implemented its confidence building measures (CBM)..

Lets be realistic about Pakistan, today fundamnetal forces in Pakistan are so strong that any politician whether Bhutto, Sharif or the General all need them to survive in office. Further the Indian animosity card has been well played by Paki politicians to the pak people to take their mind off their real problems-education, health care, poverty, commerce employment the list is endless. A bleeding India serves Pakistan better that a peaceful South Asia, this because it allows Pakistan to go around the world asking the world aid, weopons and a platform to shout its psedo-nation theory.

got that "God"

2006-07-27 04:14:04 · answer #1 · answered by Abhi 1 · 3 1

As I understand, after every terrorist attack of which India has been a victim, terrorists operating from Pakistan had a hand and every time Pakistan offered to co-operate with the Indian Government but only lip service because when asked to act, Pakistan has always been hesitant. For instance, after the recent blast in Mumbai, the Indian Government requested Pakistan to arrest and hand over two individuals purportedly linked with this and other blasts for interrogation but they refused to oblige. Instead, Pakistani President Musharraf has been releasing threatening signals to India. In fact, addressing a gathering of Paki-diplomats in Islamabad on 30 June 2006, he said:"Listen to me on Kashmir or else..." And the latest attacks in Srinagar and Mumbai occurred soon after that which shows he has been signalling and encouraging terrorists within Pakistan, directly or indirectly abeted by the government and its ISI, to go ahead and act by making such undiplomatic and totally unwarranted remarks! Pakistan has all along been and remains a terrorist state and it is getting gradually well-exposed. And, Pakistan as a nation will get totally destroyed or fragmented from within by fanatic elements who are against the present regime and the nuclear arsenals in that country are strongly likely to fall in the hands of those terrorists! The consequences are unimaginably dangerous to the people of Pakistan and other countries around as well as the entire world!

2006-07-27 03:40:10 · answer #2 · answered by Sami V 7 · 0 0

ok - im a hindu, and several of my very good friends are muslim.

that being sorted out, i believe the majority of pakistanis are pretty much like the majority of indians - given a choice we'd play cricket and watch hindi movies all day.

then there are the nuts on both sides. in india, we have our own nuts - we just vote them out every 5 years and let in a new set of nuts. so our nuts are benign. unfortunately, given pakistan's poor history of democracy, your nuts ended up in a place where they can really behave like psychopaths- that curious establishment called the ISI, i.e. the same guys who established the taliban and the LeT, and who are probably hiding osama today.

so when india accuses pakistan of terror support, we have good reason to (and history backs us up) - unfortunately your nuts have let you down.

2006-07-27 03:29:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because in the case of Kasmir separatist movements, there IS evidence that the Pakistani government is supporting the organizations, and has in the past supported other terrorist organizations like al Qaida

EDIT: See source below, I'm adding more as I find them.

2006-07-27 03:22:12 · answer #4 · answered by Brian L 7 · 0 0

Hindus hate Muslims

2006-07-27 03:20:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

india has many proofs to show that many terrorist camps are working in POK. but because pakistan is a member of american alliance so india could do nothing about it although india has many proofs to show the others

2006-07-27 03:39:34 · answer #6 · answered by MINKU 1 · 0 0

And what about USA in Iraq a?

2006-07-27 03:20:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

come on, Pakistan ? are peacfull ppls ?

2006-07-27 03:34:23 · answer #8 · answered by aviv7337 2 · 0 0

I pity for you poor knowledge !!!

2006-07-27 03:25:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Racial profiling--If you're brown, you're guilty.

2006-07-27 03:18:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers