Are you satisfied to see the media coverage of the well known popular news agencies of the world? What is your opinion on civilian casualty and what would be the best way to save the innocent lives in this situation?
2006-07-27 03:03:49 · 10 answers · asked by vison 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
It's disappointing and inaccurate at best: painting a one-sided, prejudicial picture that isn't always factual and, more often than not, reflects the jaded perceptions and political agenda of the reporter.
2006-07-27 03:08:39 · answer #1 · answered by Warrior 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Finally most of the news outlets have taken there blinders off and are presenting a more accurate and balanced picture of what is going on in the Middle East. Instead of joining the Bush/neocon march to a glorious victory in there own minds, the news folks are now focusing more on the boots on the ground and casualties. Finally, the media is contrasting what the conditions actually are in Iraq and Lebanon compared to what is said in Washington DC, finally the viciousness of this march to war is being revealed and discussed in the media, and finally the natural skepticism has appeared in media broadcasts as it should have been from the beginning of the Bush Wars.
Better late then never, but the cost in human life has been too high, way to high, for too long over a span of fifty years and counting.
How many times is the news media going parrot a President's propaganda and sales pitch as if it were an accurate attempt to analyze events as they happened and to tell the story of the buildup and triggers pulled.
How many times, Vietnam, Iraq and Lebanon do we have to witness this madness?
2006-07-27 11:18:17 · answer #2 · answered by zclifton2 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
As always it is pro Israel. I have no problem with Israel but please give us an unbiased coverage for once!
For an example, it took nearly three days to report (in the mainstream media) how many Lebanese civilians were killed, and never was it shown (the photos taken of) dead Lebanese childrean lying on the streets. Nor was it shown that Israeli children back in Haifa were writing messages on the bombs that hit those innocent civilians. Red cross ambulances were hit, many humanitarians in Lebanon were killed, both Christian and Muslim neighborhoods were hit...having no connection with Hezbollah. Yet the U.S. media is slow to report this.
2006-07-27 10:07:23 · answer #3 · answered by Sha 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It really depends on the networks, mostly liberal clap the reporters continue to sensationalize the collateral damage and fail to focus on the fact that there are soldiers out there on all sides willing to give their lives for the right to be free in a sovereign nation without fear of reprisals from within or out! reaper out.....
2006-07-27 10:15:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
let me say it straight all the Media in USA Is ain`t good or corrupted,, and that is because it shows only one side of what is going on, it shows that USA is always right and the rest of the world are wrong,,,
that is what i think..
well concerning that solution: ISRAEL SHOULD BE DESTROYED AND SHOULD FADE AWAY...
also:LEAVE THE ARABIAN WORLD ALONE YOU DON`T HAVE TO GET YOUR NOSE IN EVERYTHING ...
2006-07-27 11:47:36 · answer #5 · answered by lebanese female 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no, most of the media coverage is biased against Israel
2006-07-27 10:06:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Fox News does it right.
2006-07-27 10:06:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
AS PER EXPECTED, ON THE SIDE OF THE POOR VICTOMISED TERRORISTS.....AND THEIR SUPPORTERS..
2006-07-27 10:46:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It was very well covered ....
2006-07-27 10:07:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://www.fromisraeltolebanon.info/
May be fake!
2006-07-27 10:22:00 · answer #10 · answered by talkbox 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋