English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

According to recent reports one of the top riders tested posted for performance enhancing substances. Meanwhile Landis is nowhere to be found. He skipped many of the races he was committed to ride, which doesn't make sense because of the money he would've earned by simply participating. I really hope it isn't the case, cause I think Landis is great. But, I'm getting nervous.....

2006-07-27 02:46:14 · 8 answers · asked by conservativeguyfromnc 2 in Sports Cycling

Here's a link to the article that makes me suspicious. If he's guilty, I hope he has the integrity to admit his guilt, instead of denying like all the other cyclists.

http://sports.yahoo.com/sc/news?slug=afp-cyclingusadennedlandis&prov=afp&type=lgns

2006-07-27 02:56:38 · update #1

8 answers

I hadn't heard anything like that. I really hope that you're worying over nothing, but that stage was an absolute monster performance from him! Now you've got me thinking...
.

Edit; I read the piece and wouldn't worry too much. He could well have become burnt out after such a strong run during the TDF It is interesting though; I wonder who the rider might be?

2006-07-27 02:50:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

NO way! for many motives: a million. His meant T/E ratio grew to become into 11 cases bigger than standard. 11 cases! 2. Such bigger ranges might propose he doped heavily the night in the previous the mountain degree. Why might a expert bicycle proprietor use the main in simple terms got here across SUBSTANCE IN game if he KNEW he could be examined afterwards? 3. Testosterone is a HORMONE. Hormones do not "circulate away" in 24 hours and if Landis DID have that top of a testosterone point it would nevertheless be present day whilst he grew to become into examined day after at present. 4. The French lab that did the "attempting out" admitted that there grew to become into an "subject with labeling the samples" yet that they've been advantageous landis doped. it quite is the comparable lab that attempted to nail Lance Armstrong 147 cases (21 ranges x 7 excursion wins) in the time of the excursion without fulfillment, so their ethics are certainly questionable. 5. The media grew to become into "leaked" ideas approximately Landis' alleged doping in the previous excursion policies allowed. Dick Pound, the president of WADA, sees no issue with that and remains on a private project to make certain Landis stripped of the excursion call and banned from the sport in the previous the learn is concluded. Why might somebody that allegedly stands for honest game be so biased? 6. expert athletes have the main more desirable varieties of doping ever created. Are they the only ones interior the international with the skill to regulate try leads to their desire? How annoyed might desire to the French be for not triumphing their own race in over 2 many years (Bernard Hinault, 1985)? What might WE do if a French team gained the excellent Bowl 8 years working? It in simple terms isn't clever, biologically OR logically. there is greater for the French to benefit in lambasting an American rider than permitting genuine justice.

2016-12-10 15:36:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Wait a minute; you were quick to suspect Sastre and Klöden of using performance enhancing drugs after their performances in Stage 16, but you're willing to give Landis the benefit of the doubt right now? Boy, you're a peach!

I certainly hope Landis didn't use any banned substance and I hope further testing of his "B" sample will show that the first test was erroneous. However, if Floyd knowingly cheated he deserves the same scorn you were prepared to level at Sastre and Klöden.

2006-07-27 04:35:20 · answer #3 · answered by metimoteo 6 · 0 0

Landis and Armstrong are doped

2006-07-28 15:24:24 · answer #4 · answered by latêtatoto 2 · 0 0

Floyd is innocent! Screw France!

2006-07-27 03:53:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They all dope. Every last one of them, whether they know it or not.

2006-07-27 05:51:01 · answer #6 · answered by Atilla 2 · 0 0

i don't think so, i haven't even heard of the speculation

2006-07-27 03:03:44 · answer #7 · answered by cubscaps33 5 · 0 0

floyd is guilty . screw america

2006-07-28 15:04:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers