2006-07-27 02:37:49 · 16 answers · asked by ? 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
who cares anyway
2006-07-28 21:28:25 · answer #1 · answered by archaeologia 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No. The UK should not be involved in supporting these military activities.
However, I wonder why the question is only concerned about Lebanese children? I am concerned equally about Lebanese adults, babies and other civilians being targeted in this way, as well as other foreigners who have not been able to escape the killing grounds.
Alex
2006-07-27 09:48:03 · answer #2 · answered by Rolf 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ndeily: You're not in the UK are you? Either that or you've not been reading the news. See the link below.
One irony in all this pointed out in the news a couple of nights ago is that while the US have been shipping arms to Israel for use on Hezbollah (with devastatingly high rate of collateral damage), they've also been shipping in medical supplies to Lebanon. But then again, people do say that Americans lack a sense of irony.
2006-07-27 09:46:00 · answer #3 · answered by k² 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is that the intended use of those missiles or are you just bending the question? I personally agree with Israel defending itself against a fundamentalist army based in Lebanon. Not too happy with civilians being killed in the process so perhaps we should impound the missiles until further notice.
2006-07-27 09:44:28 · answer #4 · answered by Stammerman! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you suggesting a different airport then? It's wrong to kill anyone, especially innocent men, women AND children. You make it sound as if the Israelis are aiming at children in particular, what they are doing is WRONG.. and no they should not use Scotland or anywhere else.
2006-07-27 09:50:30 · answer #5 · answered by reggie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, they should use far more airports in the uk to make it as easy as possible.
Now shut up spouting ill informed lefty crap and start worrying about the Israeli kids as well
2006-07-27 09:47:48 · answer #6 · answered by heath 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you agree that Damascus, Syria should be used as a way point for Iran to ship rockets to kill Israeli kids?
Your one sided question betrays your anti-Israeli sentiments.
Grow up jerk.
2006-07-27 09:54:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, and that would mean that the aircraft would have to fly direct to Israel, which may not be possible due to the endurance of the aircraft.
2006-07-27 13:28:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
why are we getting involved anyway? why do we have to get involved in everything that goes on in other countries? and why do they all come over here to escape their own countries and then vilify ours?... sorry... one question just leads to many more and i doubt there's a best answer!
2006-07-27 09:53:52 · answer #9 · answered by charlie123 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No of course I don't, but this is a loaded question which begs the answer!
2006-07-27 09:43:12 · answer #10 · answered by clausiusminkowski 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a little ridiculous don't you think? If they didin't use that airport they would use another.
2006-07-27 09:41:50 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋