English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Of the Science vs Creation feud of the week, the more aggressive opponents of them vs them ("oppose themselves" like Hatfields vs McCoys) seem to be Athiests vs Evangelicals. Athiests are more aggressive about having no God than Evangelicals are about having no Evolution. Time magazine reports a third camp emerging which would bridge the gap, as US would do in a mid-east crisis; spearheadead by a scientist supposedly enlightened to the trinity by discovering 3 converging waterfalls frozen together.

My take is none of such for me thanks:
- any god that can be destroyed ought to be destroyed
(mind not "high" things, of a God on "high")
- creationists should go on to made of created/made
(as it is written "as in Adam[in them created] all die")
- science has it's findings altered, to get gov't grants
- if faith has to be protected from truth, it's already dead
- frozen in time trinity of frozen chosen isn't moving on

Rather let us all move on, go on unto perfection

2006-07-27 01:13:18 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

4 answers

One day a scientist was talking to God. He said, "You know God, that creating human life isn't really all that hard to do." God answered, "Really? Show me how easy it is then." The scientist reached down and picked up a handful of dirt. God slapped it out of his hand and said, "Get your own dirt."

2006-07-27 01:53:04 · answer #1 · answered by Calill C 6 · 0 0

Reality or fairy tales? Duh! Freedom to think or bigoted cement head. I'll give the "Supreme Being" 1 hour to perform a miracle that will make me believe. If after an hour and a second nothing happens I'll know he is still evolving and give him some more time. I think that's fair. Yes, I believe in good vs. evil and try to live a moral life but enough with the fairy tales already. It's 2006 and you would figure most people would be educated by now but....

2006-07-27 09:45:33 · answer #2 · answered by Thomas S 4 · 0 0

1 Corinthians 15:
39 All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds. 40 There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial: but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another.

2 Corinthians. 4:4
In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.

Jeremiah 10:12 - He has made the earth by His power, He has established the world by His wisdom, and has stretched out the heavens at His discretion.

1 Corinthians 2:
5 That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God. 6 Howbeit we speak wisdom among them that are perfect: yet not the wisdom of this world, nor of the princes of this world, that come to nought.

A Russian communist newspaper once explained that they did not need to teach atheism directly in their schools. The could accomplish the same purpose by teaching "the foundations of Darwinism." (HRQ, p. 63)

2 Peter 3:5 - For this they willfully forget: that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of water and in the water.

QUESTION: WHY IS THERE A MISSING LINK?

ANSWER: because it was NEVER THERE!

God told you he made everything, but you want to find a reason not to believe him. You take his creation and try to prove it wasn't his. You deny there is a God, but God will judge you!

2006-07-28 00:28:06 · answer #3 · answered by mornings_sunshine 2 · 0 0

If people let the evidence guide their conclusions, rather than trying to make the evidence fit their pre-existing beliefs, then an acceptance of evolution and rejection of creationism is inevitable.

2006-07-27 08:18:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers