I think Russia is an undecided. Their country is in major financial trouble. They can not defend themselves alone. They can not afford a major loss with no one to help repair them. It is also the swing vote for some others. Columbia is too busy with drug business to be a threat & Venezuela is working with the next Miss Universe - also too far to be much help. China has a lot of power we believe but they are completely untested.
If USA & Canada & Mexico make them come here - they will be too tired from rowing.
Seriously - The USA & allies will win there 3rd world war in a row.
2006-07-26 17:05:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
You have some errors in your list.
1. EU -they will not be with us. They are owed to much money from the Axis.
2. All of Africa- To busy fighting themselves
3. All of these because they only care about themselves:
• Caribbean Countries
• African Union less Morocco and Egypt
• Taiwan
• Brazil
• Iraq
• Turkey
• Jordon
• Omen/Yemen/UAE
• Saudi Arabia
• Kuwait
• Former Soviet Union less Russia
• South America less Colombia and Venezuela
• Central America less Panama
• India
• S. Korea
This all depends of course of where it is fought at initially. If it is in the M. East you can only count on the USA, Spain and a few other token countries. And it will be us against all of them plus France..
2006-07-26 17:08:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Boredstiff 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't like your teams, it's not realistic!
It will be most of Europe, US, China, Israel, India vs. Most of the Middle East and a bit of the far East, much of Africa
Playing fields. Tibet, Kashmire, Middle East, Israel, Palestine, Africa, possibly Macedonia and Cyprus, possibly Bosnia, Croatia and Hertozchovino.
Outlying regions. Anywhere where the Infidels are found.
Sitting on the side lines
Russia, Turkey, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Some of the Easter Bloc, The French, some of the Nordic countries.
Potential allies who are isolated but could join: Most of South America and Mexico.
At stake, Judeo-Christianity vs World Islam.
To the Victor goes OIL
Wild cards, Pakistan and India, both nuclear powers.
Christians and Chinese on a mutal pack to defend each other from offense has a combined force of close to 2 billion, however it's going to be hard to moblize them, especially since they'll be putting out 9/11 fires at home (from deep rooted Muslim Terror cells located in EVERY nation of the world)! Figure 1 Billion "multi nationals" vs 750,000,000 Jihad fighters.
Islam has just over 1 billion. They have no problems using 10 year old boys.
That's sort of the way it's already being played and will be played.
The Muslims want Tibet the Chinese don't want them. Politics makes for strange bedfellows. Commies and Christains could make a United Front. Especially if China gets to oversee some of the Far East and possible even PAkistan.
It would play out like WWII When Russia took over the Baltic region.
2006-07-26 17:16:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the African Nations, Caribbean Nations and Central America would be neutral. I think Egypt would be an ally. Hong Kong is an Axis by default unless they somehow separate totally from China. I think most of SE Asia goes Axis also. Of course I believe the Allies will win but at a very high cost.
2006-07-26 17:13:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Interesting groupings. Seriously, I think you hit it right on the head there. The only few I would be unsure about are Mexico, Russia, and Lebanon.
I guess Mexico would would side with us, but if this is based at all on previous World Wars, then you have to think of the Zimmerman note and what almost happened there.
To me, Russia is under the 'Axis' category simply because of the Cold War. To be honest, I don't know enough either way to decide for myself.
As far as Lebanon goes, I honestly have no idea. Did you put them under 'Axis' because of the current events going on there or what? Again, this is probably just my ignorance showing through here so, forgive me.
Oh, and why do you think Panama would be neutral? Just asking, I might just put them under the 'Allies' category on default.
As far as who would win, conventionally I believe (unbiased, of course...) that the 'Allies' would win, almost definitely. "conventionally" meaning without WMD's. As this scenario would not likely happen, I suppose there is an uncomfortably large chance that no one would win. (especially with nukes)
2006-07-26 17:15:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by marimbaman 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hey man i agree totally with you. Except some of of the "allies" like Iraq are too weak to really help us in World War 2. Who knows who will win?? It will be bloody that is for sure. N.Korea, Iran, China, and Russian are forminable enemies.
2006-07-26 17:52:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by crackheaddoc 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Erm you do word homosexuality wasn't accepted by creating use of each and every corporation astounding? And slavery replaced into VERY large interior the Pre-Christian global. And the conventional corporation of Christians did no longer demonize homosexuality the Romans did and there ought to were some particularly proper reason because of the reality that Romans theory having an similar sex extra ideal 0.5 made them the sh*t. And it wasn't the Non-Roman Christians that did it on account that the they were too busy being slaves or killed whichever the Emperor theory replaced into first-value. And slavery existed in each and every fringe of the global. And why? because of the very actuality the the global replaced into full of tyrants then. And what you reported is 100% organic and organic bollocks. Racism & bigotry weren't created by creating use of Christianity neither were they raised by creating use of it both. Being racist way you experience that you & your people are the very purely right corporation and that is reported for each tribe. and examine were given faith bigotry replaced into promoted by creating use of Christianity? and examine were given faith the "pagan" gods did no longer provide a f*ck about what people did? Do you even understand some ingredient about the Pre-Christian global? Or do you actually pass by creating use of Neo-Pagan propaganda? heavily end talking by creating use of your ***
2016-10-15 06:16:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That sounds like a good list.. though do yo think Russia will be against us... i dont know but its coming in the next couple years.. i hope they dont pull out the draft in the USA or Canada... stephen harper is a mini George W.
2006-07-26 17:02:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Either way America is more than full and over running with potential enemy's......so does it really matter.
When hell is unleashed....it will hard to contain......
the Question you should be asking is ARE YOU PREPARED TO DEFEND YOUR SELF AND YOUR FAMILY FROM WITHIN YOUR OWN COUNTRY.......
that's what a WW is all about ..the U.S has been lucky twice so far but but the 3Rd's the charm.
2006-07-26 18:43:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by MantisR 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
oh too big i don't think it'll be that widespread hmmm
allies:
USA
UK
Canada
Australia
New Zealand
Western Europe
Israel
Evil Peeps:
China
Russia
Iran
Syria
Venezuela
Neutrals:
India
Pakistan
the usual neutral's
mexico (i doubt they'll be in)
cuba (they are too weak and they know it)
what if's??
Brazil and Argentina (both great power in the making)
South Africa (more western i think)
Egypt (what are they gonna do with all those american weapons!?)
2006-07-26 19:27:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by gothicirishpeople 3
·
0⤊
0⤋