LAPD Special Order 40 challenged in court tommorrow, any thoughts?

Question

Speaking of sanctuary policies, Judicial Watch continues to fight its legal battle on behalf of taxpayers against the LAPD's version, "Special Order 40." On July 14, Judicial Watch filed a legal memorandum with the California Superior Court. A court hearing is scheduled for July 27.

http://www.postchronicle.com/commentary/article_21230211.shtml

Jeremiah why wouldn't it matter, this is from your source:

But on October 4, 1999, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of a landmark decision by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals (USA v VASQUEZ-ALVAREZ), confirming that state and local law enforcement officials are free to arrest criminals solely on the basis of illegally being in the U.S.

Answer 1

The city will just create another version of Order 40. There is no political balance. The way is for Congress to deprive the city of Federal funds if they aid and abet criminal activity.

Another way is to publicize that City policy is responsible for the deaths and exploitation of aliens. Plant a cross on City Hall for every death in the desert.

Answer 2

The preemption issue is one pro-illegals are using to challenge the Hazelten PA law, so it will be interesting to see how that goes.

This isn't in mainstream press for some inexplicable reason, so we may have to hire a paralegal service to find out how the hearing on the demurrer goes on Thursday.

Thanks for the information.

Answer 3

I don't know if it even matters either way, police aren't supposed to be askin' for personal info of people who aren't suspected of a crime in California but do it anyway.

Answer 4

Dar-Judicial Watch are good guys-look on Web-they do many good things

Answer 5

I'd love to see this found unconstitutional, but it still doesn't mean we'll see enforcement.