Sounds like a good idea to me.
To appease the bleeding hearts, how about if we wait until their second offense? They all have "rap sheets as long as their arms," so I don't think it will really be a problem waiting for their second conviction.
2006-07-26 15:31:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by FozzieBear 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Absolutely not!
There are too many innocent that are convicted, even executed, as it is now. Maybe if there was a war and someone with a weapon, wearing the other side's uniform, would deserve that. Right now, we've got so many wannabees that want to act anti-social for fun. I sometimes put on a suit and tie, shine my shoes, and take my mrs. to a fancy restaurant--but I'm not rich. Next thing, you will want to triple my taxes because for a couple of hours I might look richer than I am.
Convict them, honestly, for wrong-doing and get them out of circulation--kill them for appearances? Definitely not.
2006-07-26 15:35:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Rabbit 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Policing is not any longer about justice and crime scuffling with it is ticking packing bins, who cares if you're in charge or no longer, get a effect, if we see a yob contained in the line with a hearth bomb shoot him, if we see a criminal smashing up automobile in a insurrection shoot him, for once imagine about the persons who's lives are destroyed by those senseless fools, then drag each and every of the faculty instructors out for permitting them to spend 10 plus years in college and generating those 0.5 wits, our modern youngsters society is an ad to the failure of our coaching and enforcement device, provide the persons decrease back the line or sparkling them up, yet stop arresting the victims.
2016-10-15 06:13:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell yes, if they're commiting crimes. We're still a nation governed by laws. If the laws were to change then the appropriate response should be applied to a crime. Personally, they add penalties for using guns or computers in a crime, there should really be stiff increases in punishment for gang related crimes.
2006-07-26 15:33:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by oldmoose2 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No good comes from generalizing people like this. A gang is still made up of individual people. It's unfair to say they're 'all like this' or 'all like that'
2006-07-26 15:40:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by larsor4 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sounds like a bunch of terrorists to me.....we should treat the same as we do terrorists. They ruin society, destroy our sense of security, damage property and people, brainwash the young, etc........So whatever we do to terrorists, we should do to gangs. They are the one and the same.
2006-07-26 15:37:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by ami 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
if it were up to me.....I would put them all on a deserted
island and let them all kill each other. I have NO sympathy
for those evil beings. I would drop down in a helicopter just
enough food for a third of them, and let them fight over it !!
2006-07-26 15:33:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by CraZyCaT 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Are we talking "THE Democrats" and "The Republicans"???? They certainly fit your description of gang bangers
2006-07-26 15:34:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by gamerunner2001 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think so I think that they will be taken good care of when they are judged by God in his own time
2006-07-26 15:34:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sure gang members, prostitutes, speeders, and jay-walkers kill them all and let GOD sort it all out lol
2006-07-26 15:33:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋