God is eternal, without time, but nearest to our concept of "always." He has, does, and "always" will exist outside of time. He allows our time to move in a uniform manner because we are temporal creatures, and He created this world for us, and us for this world. But He could do what He wanted with it, if He wanted to, and I am sure He has.
2006-07-26 15:15:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by NotMySecret 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The word "aeternal" means "without time." Nowadays most people drop the spelling that people who read Latin call a "ligature," so we spell the word "eternal" in most cases today.
The point is that we call the most important and sacred things "timeless" or "aeternal," which means the same thing. God can be so if they wish.
The findings of modern physics suggest that time is a very local phenomenon, associated numerically with changes and processes in physical matter and systems.
Quantum physics suggests that one nanosecond before the Big Bang, all the matter in the universe was crammed together into a solid nodule about the size of a tangerine. God was in there, too.
God decided to instill in all those particles of matter a force that drove them apart. And Kabam! they all scattered, taking God with them. And that is how God came to be scattered throughout the universe. A little bit of God went with every particle. So by allowing him/her/themselves to be blown to holy splat by the Big Bang, God gave spirit and love to all things.
Thus all religions in this and other worlds have stories about God giving his/her/their life for the love of their creation.
And so the God that is scattered measures time, but in a very different way from the way we do, and he/she/they can also be outside of it.
When you die and go to the next life, the first thing you will see is a little sign that reads "Please Register Here." Some things will be very familiar.
2006-07-26 15:37:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by aviophage 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, that's true. It's a hard concept to understand. God created time so that we can try to understand our existence.
2006-07-26 15:23:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Paul McDonald 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes he exists outside of time, Him always existing is just our perception of Him existing outside of time
2006-07-26 15:14:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
answer this: why?? Who the @#$@ are you to assert an immaterial being won't be in a position of have an effect on cloth platforms? I understand your argument, that 'immaterial' is the equivalence of 'non-existent' - non-existent in the actual elementary: sure. yet whilst i'm a 2-dimensional being (no, this would possibly not happen, yet to illustrate's sake) and a three-dimensional being tried to speak what the third measurement exchange into like, could I definitely have any reference or base to entice from to start to understand this form of thought? No. So why is this so stressful to understand? 1000 years in the past, sensory excluded phenomena like electromagnetic waves could have been an quite foreign places thought to somebody purely believing what they could hit upon. yet we do interface with electromagnetic waves do no longer we? if actuality be told, some are needs in regulating our actual platforms, so even tho they're perceivable on a diffused point, we don't have the backside to distinguish them from another sensory impulse. plenty is the comparable with the non secular effect in this worldwide. It, in basic terms with the aid of fact the actual forces, are ruled with the aid of regulations, that are no longer even close to to understood with the aid of this planet's sentience, despite if it does no longer advise it does not exist. We purely hit upon the tail end of such technique' with the aid of fact the effect and have not any actual ability of figuring out them, so we fall into the comparable catch all stupid people have believed in for see you later, and in doing so, completely pass over the element of existence, so what happens? they arrive lower back, persistently and lower back, engaged in a damn close to infinite cycle of lack of understanding till we finally get it. i'm no longer attempting to make you sense dumb, i'm in basic terms providing yet another selection, a attainable turning element on your existence, take it or go away it. I in basic terms defined the implications. with the aid of this, i do no longer advise settle for something on blind faith, i'm asserting open your self as much as the different opportunities you have been too skeptical to entertain and enable them to teach themselves to you genuine or fake, yet do no longer shrink your self short and purchase the mainstreamed sentience of this planet.. in case you wanna be responsive to ways we've all been duped you need to offer the possibility a guess in the previous you're making up your strategies. Make experience? i be responsive to, in all risk no longer..
2016-10-08 08:54:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
"If you picture Time as a straight line along which we have to travel, then you must picture God as the whole page on which the line is drawn." (168)
2006-07-26 15:30:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Samantha 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I think so,
I've heard that his timing is very different than ours.
2006-07-26 15:12:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-07-26 15:14:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by pontiac_stephen 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
god stay in december thats where he lives
2006-07-26 15:15:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by mack j 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, in heaven there will be no time.
2006-07-26 15:22:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋