I suspect that whould have stopped "the insurgency."
2006-07-26 08:56:09 · 9 answers · asked by why 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Oh yeah...we wouldn't want to hurt the children that were jumping up and down having a party with smiles all over their faces as those men's bodies hung from the bridge.
2006-07-26 09:10:21 · update #1
no, we should have used the largest one we have and repeat daily for about a week. that might do it...........................
2006-07-26 09:05:27 · answer #1 · answered by truthteller 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Oh yeah, make sure you kill all those "insurgent" babies, children, and women..that will show them, huh?
The hardest thing for people to do in a time of war is to put themselves in someone else's place. Let's imagine it the other way around..let's say another country invaded the US..would we be called insurgents for fighting back against the invasion? There is always a double-standard.
2006-07-26 16:02:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are thinking with you emotions. We all felt that way. No, it's not a good idea. Why? Believe it or not, not all of Fallujah committed the acts. Could they have helped stop them? I don't know. We're fighting terrorists. That is what they do. Don't let emotions overtake common sense. Way too soon some one will drop a small nuke somewhere.....maybe on me or you. Why? Because some believe blood alone wipes out blood. It's a bloody war.
2006-07-26 16:04:26 · answer #3 · answered by Devil'sFoot37@sbcglobal.net 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, but we did use chemical weapons (white phosphorus) in Fallujah if that makes you feel any better.
If it gets you off there is a link to a video where you can see all the damage it caused below. Plenty of burnt bodies for you to look at without using a nuke.
2006-07-26 16:03:15 · answer #4 · answered by Jared H 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Depends on your point of view. Other forces(US included) have done similar things. It is just kept from the public. If we were not there,the marines would be alive now.When will the rest of America grow wise and stop dying to line the pockets and further the aims of wealth and power mongers???? There is nothing wrong with being wealthy just how you acquire that wealth and use it. Peace.
2006-07-26 16:23:29 · answer #5 · answered by wildrover 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Because what you are suggesting is that you wipe out an entire race of people because you think it would be quicker and easier. Lets not forget that for insurgent in a country there are also many innocent civilians.
2006-07-26 15:59:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are a total douchebag. Ever heard of genocide? that's what invading a sovereign nation and killing hundreds of thousands of civilians is called.
2006-07-26 15:59:45 · answer #7 · answered by hambycat 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
We have plenty of conventional weapons to get the point across.
The problem is, we have some slow learners.
2006-07-26 16:00:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
small nuke,,, as opposed to a medium size or super-sized nuclear bomb,,, what the hell
2006-07-26 16:01:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋