I know it's an old question, but I really don't understand it. Please help me out.
ID is about the 'Watchmaker' - 'A complex creation like a watch requires a watchmaker'. Fine, okay, sure. But why is God exempt from this? 'Who created God?' is a pointless question - I agree. But it becomes a practical question if somebody is telling you that the universe is too complex to have formed independently.
Why should I then accept that God is _not_ too complex to have formed independently?
2006-07-26
08:53:00
·
5 answers
·
asked by
XYZ
7
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
diamond_doll: I never said that I believed the universe always existed. I said that the proposal that it always existed is as legitimate as the proposal that God always existed. I don't have a problem with the notion that God is uncreated (apart from not believing it), but if you tell me that complex things _require_ a creator, then it begs the question why God is exempt from that rule. It's the logic that bothers me.
2006-07-26
09:02:51 ·
update #1