I'd have to be fair and save one fundie for every two gay docs.
2006-07-26 06:36:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
Ah, what interesting answers. Let's change it up a little, shall we?
10 doctors vs. 100 preschool children
10 doctors vs. 100 elementary school teachers
10 doctors vs. 100 lawyers
10 doctors vs. 100 Buddhists
10 doctors vs. 100 Sunni Muslims
10 doctors vs. 100 Wiccans
10 doctors vs. 100 Fundie Christians, 8 of whom are doctors, but you don't know which ones
10 doctors vs. 100 politicians
Me, I'd save the highest numbers of lives possible. I'd choose the 10 doctors and 90 of the Fundies, leaving the 10 worst injured to their fate.
Of course, questions like this are asinine for a lot of reasons, such as, Many doctors are Christians, and plenty of Christians are doctors. Also, you obviously have the capacity to save 100 lives. Or just the fact that people's lives have value regardless of their religious affiliation.
The prejudice of some people is quite amusing...
2006-07-26 06:36:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by LooneyDude 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definitely the doctors.
Unless the train conductor was participating in the gay orgy at the time the accident happened and that's why the accident happened... That'd be just wrong...
Of course, I'd like to save whoever I could, without checking their credentials. But you could say that if you save a doctor who could help saving the other people, you'd be better off. Whether or not they're having gay orgies.
I remember reading about a hospital on the line between Israel and the West Bank that, during the Intifadah, employed both Israelis and Palestinians who were helping all sick, regardless of the language that they spoke.
They were recieving death threats from both sides.
Amazing, isn't it?
2006-07-26 06:27:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by XYZ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The 10 Doctors - who in return will save the Christians and many others in times to come.
2006-07-26 06:28:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by R G 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The doctors without question. Who cares if they are gay, if they could save just one person its all good with me. But if i saved the fundamentalist christians, they might try to start worshipping me, that might not be too bad either. So now im confused. Ah, the gay doctors win, at least we can piss off more of the religious types with their gayness.
2006-07-26 06:28:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gay Atheist Doctors, because the Doctors are more likely to help others then the Christians.
2006-07-26 12:43:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is there a cute female gay doctor? Score!
I hate to admit it, but I'd be more likely to rescue the doctors, since they're more likely to save others' lives. I'm probably also biased because I like doctors more than Christians.
2006-07-26 06:27:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Minh 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Save the 100 fundies. It's all about the most good that can be done, and just because I don't agree with them (at all), doesn't mean they don't deserve to live.
Though I'm not an atheist, I'm an agnostic. Maybe the question wasn't for me.
2006-07-26 06:59:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Eldritch 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think try to save both groups given their own standards. Glance over at the Fundies, and say, "Jesus, save these people's lives." Then give the doctors medical treatment. Whoever has the most survivors wins! HOORAY!!!
2006-07-26 06:27:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither of them; only Christ can save someone. As far as trying to preserve life. Being a Christian, if this happened to me, I'd pick two of the Christians and all 10 of the doctors because sometimes God uses non-believers, whether they know it or not.
Christians aren't as dim-witted as you think.
2006-07-26 06:26:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by chrstnwrtr 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm sure the God-fearing charitable Christians would want me to save the doctors. So indeed it is a no-brainer. I do hope the doctors are clothed.
2006-07-26 06:28:59
·
answer #11
·
answered by JAT 6
·
0⤊
0⤋