Would you say actually read the links and additional details?
I think we're at about 14%, and that's being generous.
2006-07-26 03:48:12 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I will not open another link again after the one I opened yesterday. It was that "dirty trucker" guy, who claimed to have had sex with jesus, and his link was supposed to give us proof. I clicked on it and bam! a hundred windows opended up with aweful pictures of a masculine female body builder and what looked like a man pulling his own sphincter apart, with a loud voice over announcing "look at me I'm looking at gay porn" over and over again. It was almost like a dam virus. Never again, ever will I open someone's link, thanks to that jerk.
2006-07-26 04:07:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 3⤋
I followed about 3 links that were given in the question... and each one was just insulting or vulgar... so.. I no longer even answer questions that rely on links...
I do follow some of the links in answers... like when someone asks for a web page to find songs.. or other info.
2006-07-26 03:55:54 · answer #2 · answered by ♥Tom♥ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is being generous. If you post a link that pertains to your question, you'll find that the majority of the answers are obviously posted without having looked at the link at all.
I find this happens whenever I link scientific pages. Not only do they not refer to the information, they can't have had taken the time to have read it.
2006-07-26 03:53:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Interesting
2006-07-26 07:12:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I read the deatils and links selectively depending on whether they sound interesting or not. I think 14% probably is generous. Most answers don't read past the part in bold, and at least half don't even read that part properly.
2006-07-26 03:53:29 · answer #5 · answered by lenny 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I usually do not. I did about a month ago and my computer got loaded with some terrible pictures-i could not stop it, i had to unplug from the juice.
I read additional details-
2006-07-26 03:54:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Christians are newborn of christ and their duty is to adhere to the bible. yet we are human beings and we've a tendency to sin some or any incorrect way. All those who keep on with christianity are christians interior the right experience. All born christians aren't from now on christians or only cos their moms and dads or ancestors are christians. even as it is composed of percentage no comments. Its no longer sensible to pass about calculating christians ordinary there are new believers,.
2016-11-26 00:44:43 · answer #7 · answered by moline 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I never read links. I read details only if I plan to answer the question.
2006-07-26 03:51:56 · answer #8 · answered by Kitten 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Call me a coward but ever since I was burned by going to a link I have stopped going to links all together.
Its safer to find info yourself. You get a better chance of not being led to a slanted site.
2006-07-26 03:55:50 · answer #9 · answered by williamzo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Links, never. Additional details, always--unless it's tediously long, in which case I'd have to say 5%.
2006-07-26 03:55:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It really depends how much time I have to read and answer. Oftentimes I skip the link questions.
Maybe 20% reads them
2006-07-26 09:08:16 · answer #11 · answered by SeeTheLight 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋