We are not in Iraq because of Bush, WE WERE ATTACKED! That being said, at this juncture with all of the anti America diatribe being espoused around the world, (and apparently by you to a lesser degree), I think we should just pack up and go home. The world has been making their position clear as to their attitude toward America. I for one am sick of it! As far as I am concerned this whole attitude of the world is dividing the American people. We are rotting from within, and we need to just get out of everyone else's business and tend to what is happening here at home. We need to call in all of the loans we have out around the world, and seize the assets of any country or business from any owing country that refuses to pay. Let them try and move the real estate they own here! America needs to become united as a people once again. Let them blow each other the hell off the face of the earth. I am sick and tired of other countries getting into a mess, asking for our help then sticking a knife in our backs. Granted there are problems with America, we are not perfect but who is? This whole mess in the middle east reminds me of a police officer being called to a domestic dispute. They respond in all good conscience to help when summoned then become the bad guys and the center of attack from both parties upon their arrival. We need to quit being the police and start being the janitors. Let them finish each other off then go in and help clean up the mess for a fee, to hell with giving financial aid to the dog that bites the hand that feeds it.
Everybody needs to get off their high horse! The only ones that do not want the Americans in Iraq or the radical clerics and Saddam Hussein...and those nancy boy Kerryites, we have been asked once again to stay and help fight the terrorism within the country by the country's government..
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060727/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq
AWWW CRAP! Now you bring religion into it? That is a major part of the problem already!!
2006-07-26 04:01:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by ronrlogan 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
We need to finish the job in Iraq. The only problem is that the political non-combatants will not allow us to use "by any means neccessary" to do so. This is simply another Vietnam. Hell MacArthur could have solved the Korean isuue, Patton the Russian one and Schwarzkopf the Iraq one if only the damn politicos would stay home and play video games instead.
I'm not completely sure I agree with the Bush comment, we really did need to stop Hussein. But once we got him we should have planned an organized a gradual withdrawl asap.
I have no problem with helping Israel as I feel they are more than just. Israel seems to get blamed for all the mideasts problems. But let's face it, what mideast dessert country isn't screwed up?? Some times I just wish the U.S. would shut itself off from the rest of the world and become self-sufficient. But than the money grubbers wouldn't be rich enough any more.
It's all about money.
2006-07-26 03:50:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by CARL Z 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iran is sponsoring the Hamas and Russia is imparting Iran with guns and military advisers. attributable to this fiasco now Iran has militants on many aspects, surrounding Israel. The Arabs choose the Jews annihilated, besides the undeniable fact that the President of Iran has been the most vocal about it. Iran will flow on Israel in the destiny quickly, they're going to be defeated, then Russia will say, "the hell with it", and march in Israel too, wondering they could do a extra ideal pastime. The armies will comprise Iran (Persia), Turkey, Ethiopia, Syria, Russia (Magog) and probably quite a few others. Then Israel will actually wipe out all yet a million/sixth of the armies, and it is going to take them 7 months to bury the useless. The Bible has already given us the outcome, we purely might want to demonstrate screen it take position. And, that is happening.
2016-10-15 05:39:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell no, they already sepnt enough money getting their tanks across the ocean, now if they want them to move another billion miles then its gonna cost them a lot, and everyone will be hell tired, plus why does america care, just get the americans out of there, and lebanon won't last more then a monththis war won't even be in the history books
2006-07-26 03:59:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Isreal need to fight their own battles.. they choose to invade their neighbor and defend themselves then that is what they need to do.. why should america go get involved in something that we have nothing to do with.. Just because America may have a bigger military power and more money to back a war doesn't mean we have to keep running to everyones aid when they have gotten themselves in to deep
2006-07-26 03:44:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are invited to stay in Iraq, & Israel has got this on their own. They are strong enough to handle Lebanon. If that changes they will ask for help. We have over 1,500,000 soldiers & less than 300,000 overseas, we can help if asked.
Iraq is very very close to being able to control their own Democratic country, coward liberals will not make us leave them now.
2006-07-26 04:08:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm waiting to see if Iran wants to get in on this, then I think Isreal will need some help
2006-07-26 03:42:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I think The United States should take it's bullying nose out of everybody else's business.
2006-07-26 06:13:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kitty 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no.stay in Iraq,Afghanistan, Germany, England,France, Cyprus, Greece, Japan, Argentina, Mexico, Bolivia, Poland, and help Israel at the same time. whatever happens to you finally, you deserve it.we do too, for letting you .next
2006-07-30 03:02:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by unknown u 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
We need to get the hell out of Iraq and stay the hell away from Israel.
2006-07-26 03:43:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by El Teke 4
·
0⤊
0⤋