2006-07-25 16:57:54 · 9 answers · asked by pisces31478 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Photography
Once your negative is ruined or wrongly exposed, it is very hard to save it. Since the orange hue is covering 1/3 of your photo chances are it won't look completely normal even with retouching. There are many things I can do in photoshop to correct this but I would have to look at it to see how bad it is. Can you see any image underneath the orange? If you have a scanner you can email me the photo and I can take a look at it. If not, try finding a retoucher near you. this_girl_is_lost@yahoo.com
2006-07-26 03:11:13 · answer #1 · answered by this_girl_is_lost 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The negative is shot... there is no doubt about that. However, you can still get a decent print using the image. Take it to a local photographer (a digital one) and they have photoretouchers that can fix the image for you, for a price.
Or anyone with enough knowledge in Photoshop can correct the image itself.
2006-07-26 02:40:44 · answer #2 · answered by Ipshwitz 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
most likely no
the negative is ruined, but the print may be able to be edited.
if you don't understand digital editing and you really want to keep the picture, take it to a lab and see what they can do for you,
2006-07-25 17:01:26 · answer #3 · answered by illusion_521 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can't save it as a color print, but you could if you went with a fine grain black and white paper like Agfa.
2006-07-25 17:02:12 · answer #4 · answered by yellow_jellybeans_rock 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not unless you scan the picture and Photoshop it. Any harm to a neg will kill your picture.
2006-07-25 17:00:07 · answer #5 · answered by Digital Katana's 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No
But if you want to try anything your best bet is to make a digital copy and try and clean it up that way.
2006-07-25 16:59:38 · answer #6 · answered by jasenlee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope : (
2006-07-25 16:59:57 · answer #7 · answered by Bill Nye the Realestate Guy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope... too late
2006-07-25 16:59:54 · answer #8 · answered by thecat 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-07-25 16:58:47 · answer #9 · answered by Mark 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋